CQ
GESUS
CQ-GESUS-ORACLE v1 · Primary Prediction
Abyssal
51%
(prob 0.513)
Wrong
Abyssal
Rooster
51%
49%
Why — Top Feature Drivers
Map-pool Elo
-0.283
Schedule strength
+0.087
Experience
+0.062
Shadow bet: 1.0u @ 1.957
→ -1.0u
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Abyssal | vs | Rooster | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
50% (1/2) |
|
0% (0/1) | +50pp |
anubis
|
20% (1/5) |
|
54% (31/57) | -34pp |
inferno
|
33% (4/12) |
|
51% (41/80) | -18pp |
mirage
|
71% (10/14) |
|
58% (46/80) | +13pp |
overpass
|
58% (7/12) |
|
70% (37/53) | -12pp |
nuke
|
44% (7/16) |
|
53% (48/90) | -9pp |
dust2
|
— | · | 56% (30/54) | |
vertigo
|
— | · | 54% (21/39) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Abyssal bans
anubis
20% WR
nuke
44% WR
Rooster bans
inferno
51% WR
mirage
58% WR
Abyssal pick
overpass
45% — Abyssal favored
Decider
ancient
100% Abyssal
Decider
vertigo
Rooster pick
dust2
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
Abyssal
anubis
Rooster
inferno
Rooster
mirage
Abyssal
overpass
Rooster
nuke
Rooster
Abyssal on left ·
Rooster on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.