T2
BO3
CS2
2026-06-09
CQ
GESUS
CQ-GESUS-ORACLE v1 · Primary Prediction
Oxuji
55%
(prob 0.550)
Wrong
Virtus.pro
Oxuji
45%
55%
Why — Top Feature Drivers
Schedule strength
-0.367
Buy power
+0.270
CT-side econ
+0.168
Shadow bet: 3.5u @ 1.843
→ -3.5u
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Virtus.pro | vs | Oxuji | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
70% (37/53) |
|
0% (0/1) | +70pp |
nuke
|
100% (2/2) |
|
54% (22/41) | +46pp |
inferno
|
64% (43/67) |
|
42% (5/12) | +22pp |
anubis
|
50% (19/38) |
|
30% (3/10) | +20pp |
mirage
|
50% (36/72) |
|
64% (7/11) | -14pp |
ancient
|
52% (42/81) |
|
39% (12/31) | +13pp |
dust2
|
50% (27/54) |
|
52% (16/31) | -2pp |
vertigo
|
43% (15/35) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Virtus.pro bans
anubis
50% WR
mirage
50% WR
Oxuji bans
ancient
39% WR
inferno
42% WR
Virtus.pro pick
dust2
49% — Virtus.pro favored
Decider
nuke
65% Virtus.pro
Decider
vertigo
Oxuji pick
overpass
0% — Oxuji favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
Virtus.pro
nuke
Virtus.pro
inferno
Virtus.pro
anubis
Virtus.pro
mirage
Oxuji
ancient
Virtus.pro
dust2
even
Virtus.pro on left ·
Oxuji on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.