ENCE vs brazylijski luz

T2 BO3 CS2 2026-06-07

ENCE

1 : 2

brazylijski luz wins

brazylijski luz Winner

CQ GESUS

1 model →

CQ-GESUS-APEX v3 · Primary Prediction

ENCE 61% (prob 0.608)

Wrong

ENCE brazylijski luz

61% 39%

Shadow bet: 8.4u @ 1.691 → -8.4u

CQ-GESUS Suite — 12 Models

TITAN ORACLE NEXUS PHANTOM MIRAGE SPECTER CIPHER CLUTCH UTILITY PISTOL SYNERGY

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	ENCE	brazylijski luz	Edge
vertigo	67% (33/49)	50% (5/10)	+17pp
anubis	57% (50/88)	42% (5/12)	+15pp
overpass	47% (21/45)	33% (2/6)	+14pp
ancient	54% (73/136)	41% (16/39)	+13pp
inferno	18% (3/17)	25% (1/4)	-7pp
nuke	57% (67/118)	59% (17/29)	-2pp
dust2	60% (53/88)	58% (7/12)	+2pp
mirage	49% (51/104)	48% (10/21)	+1pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

ENCE bans

inferno 18% WR

mirage 49% WR

brazylijski luz bans

overpass 33% WR

ancient 41% WR

ENCE pick

vertigo

57% — ENCE favored

Decider

dust2

51% ENCE

Decider

anubis

58% ENCE

brazylijski luz pick

nuke

51% — brazylijski luz favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

vertigo

57%

43%

ENCE

anubis

58%

42%

ENCE

overpass

59%

41%

ENCE

ancient

57%

43%

ENCE

inferno

42%

58%

brazylijski luz

nuke

49%

51%

even

dust2

51%

49%

even

mirage

51%

49%

even

ENCE on left · brazylijski luz on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE
MVP millert AWP	51	43	12	39%	88.7	73.3%	1.25	3.6
Schwarz RIFLER	48	44	19	42%	93.5	68.4%	1.21	5.8
HENU RIFLER	40	48	13	38%	73.6	61.0%	0.92	3.5
Cliqq	40	47	15	60%	74.4	58.6%	0.92	—
teme RIFLER	32	43	16	47%	68.0	60.3%	0.83	4.0
brazylijski luz WIN
MVP Pelle	55	37	14	56%	87.7	73.3%	1.36	—
aimy ENTRY	47	43	16	77%	98.8	75.9%	1.29	3.0
next1me	43	38	19	42%	82.3	69.5%	1.15	—
Nami	37	46	19	65%	77.7	72.9%	1.00	—
chudy ENTRY	37	45	18	59%	76.8	66.7%	0.97	2.0

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE
millert	11	12	2	18%	74.4	81.3%	1.10	3.6
Schwarz	12	14	4	50%	82.5	76.5%	1.08	5.8
HENU	13	14	5	54%	92.4	58.8%	1.04	3.5
Cliqq	10	15	7	70%	78.1	58.8%	0.82	—
teme	6	13	4	67%	54.9	56.3%	0.56	4.0
brazylijski luz WIN
aimy	17	10	7	65%	132.9	86.7%	1.79	3.0
Pelle	17	9	5	47%	85.5	76.5%	1.51	—
Nami	15	11	5	60%	89.4	77.8%	1.34	—
next1me	10	10	8	30%	74.7	76.5%	1.10	—
le chudy	10	14	7	60%	81.3	68.8%	0.94	2.0

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE
Schwarz	23	14	7	39%	124.1	70.0%	1.63	5.8
millert	17	15	5	41%	85.1	68.2%	1.16	3.6
teme	15	15	2	47%	75.0	57.1%	0.97	4.0
Cliqq	10	18	4	50%	58.3	55.0%	0.62	—
HENU	11	21	3	45%	60.3	54.6%	0.59	3.5
brazylijski luz WIN
Pelle	22	13	4	64%	93.3	79.2%	1.46	—
le chudy	15	15	7	60%	81.8	81.0%	1.18	2.0
aimy	15	17	3	93%	74.0	76.2%	1.06	3.0
Nami	14	17	7	64%	83.3	68.2%	1.00	—
next1me	15	15	3	40%	71.1	60.9%	0.96	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE WIN
millert	23	16	5	48%	102.6	72.7%	1.46	3.6
Cliqq	20	14	4	60%	86.8	61.9%	1.28	—
HENU	16	13	5	19%	72.2	70.0%	1.17	3.5
Schwarz	13	16	8	38%	72.3	60.0%	0.91	5.8
teme	11	15	10	36%	71.1	66.7%	0.90	4.0
brazylijski luz
next1me	18	13	8	50%	102.6	73.7%	1.42	—
aimy	15	16	6	73%	99.3	66.7%	1.15	3.0
Pelle	16	15	5	56%	82.6	63.2%	1.12	—
le chudy	12	16	4	58%	68.0	50.0%	0.76	2.0
Nami	8	18	7	75%	60.1	73.7%	0.69	—

Teams

Players in this match

Pelle aimy millert Schwarz next1me Nami chudy HENU Cliqq teme