Betclic vs INOX Division

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-06-06

Betclic

1 : 2

INOX Division wins

INOX Division Winner

CQ GESUS

1 model →

CQ-GESUS-APEX v3 · Primary Prediction

INOX Division 57% (prob 0.569)

Correct

Betclic INOX Division

43% 57%

Shadow bet: 5.9u @ 1.789 → 4.7u

CQ-GESUS Suite — 12 Models

TITAN ORACLE NEXUS PHANTOM MIRAGE SPECTER CIPHER CLUTCH UTILITY PISTOL SYNERGY

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Betclic	vs	INOX Division	Edge
inferno	0% (0/5)		69% (9/13)	-69pp
dust2	43% (23/53)		87% (13/15)	-44pp
ancient	52% (51/99)		86% (6/7)	-34pp
nuke	53% (49/92)		81% (13/16)	-28pp
overpass	40% (10/25)		60% (6/10)	-20pp
anubis	55% (34/62)		40% (2/5)	+15pp
mirage	52% (32/62)	·	—
vertigo	60% (9/15)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Betclic bans

inferno 0% WR

overpass 40% WR

INOX Division bans

anubis 40% WR

nuke 81% WR

Betclic pick

ancient

38% — Betclic favored

Decider

mirage

Decider

vertigo

INOX Division pick

dust2

67% — INOX Division favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

100%

INOX Division

dust2

33%

67%

INOX Division

ancient

38%

62%

INOX Division

nuke

40%

60%

INOX Division

overpass

40%

60%

INOX Division

anubis

58%

42%

Betclic

Betclic on left · INOX Division on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Betclic
MVP Prism	46	44	14	50%	85.1	66.1%	1.10	—
eskyy	39	38	7	64%	75.4	60.7%	1.00	—
Demho	36	37	9	56%	77.0	61.8%	0.98	—
Dr3nquu	42	44	6	67%	77.3	60.0%	0.97	—
hades	36	42	13	44%	75.2	60.0%	0.91	—
INOX Division WIN
MVP FenomeN AWP	45	32	14	33%	95.1	71.7%	1.33	8.1
finW	46	38	5	63%	84.3	58.9%	1.12	—
k0s	44	45	12	61%	77.5	58.7%	0.98	—
k1slll	37	40	15	46%	70.0	61.0%	0.94	—
gooddeph	36	47	12	47%	70.6	55.9%	0.82	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Betclic
Demho	15	11	3	53%	77.7	66.7%	1.15	—
Prism	16	16	9	63%	87.2	65.2%	1.09	—
eskyy	16	13	2	50%	75.2	57.1%	1.06	—
Dr3nquu	16	17	1	69%	83.7	60.9%	0.99	—
hades	11	15	4	45%	67.1	59.1%	0.79	—
INOX Division WIN
Fenomen	17	11	5	18%	88.4	71.4%	1.31	8.1
k0s	19	17	4	58%	74.8	60.0%	1.05	—
finW	15	15	1	67%	79.6	57.1%	0.98	—
gooddeph	12	16	5	33%	60.5	52.4%	0.75	—
k1slll	11	17	6	64%	70.4	52.4%	0.72	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Betclic WIN
eskyy	17	12	4	76%	99.3	83.3%	1.47	—
Demho	13	11	4	62%	92.6	75.0%	1.27	—
Prism	16	13	1	25%	79.8	63.2%	1.15	—
hades	12	12	7	33%	81.3	66.7%	1.07	—
Dr3nquu	16	15	2	50%	79.5	47.4%	0.98	—
INOX Division
Fenomen	13	12	5	31%	89.3	68.8%	1.18	8.1
k1slll	16	14	3	31%	84.5	70.0%	1.18	—
finW	15	14	3	67%	92.7	52.9%	1.09	—
k0s	11	14	4	64%	70.5	47.4%	0.76	—
gooddeph	6	18	6	50%	49.3	52.4%	0.42	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Betclic
Prism	14	15	4	64%	87.7	70.0%	1.08	—
Dr3nquu	10	12	3	90%	66.7	72.2%	0.94	—
hades	13	15	2	54%	78.7	55.0%	0.89	—
Demho	8	15	2	50%	62.2	44.4%	0.54	—
eskyy	6	13	1	67%	50.1	41.2%	0.43	—
INOX Division WIN
Fenomen	15	9	4	53%	109.5	75.0%	1.50	8.1
gooddeph	18	13	1	56%	109.4	64.7%	1.40	—
finW	16	9	1	56%	81.9	66.7%	1.32	—
k0s	14	14	4	64%	88.2	68.4%	1.11	—
k1slll	10	9	6	50%	53.3	61.1%	0.93	—

Teams

Players in this match

FenomeN finW Prism eskyy Demho k0s Dr3nquu k1slll hades gooddeph