VP.Prodigy vs Clutchain

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-06-05

VP.Prodigy

1 : 2

Clutchain wins

Clutchain Winner

CQ GESUS

1 model →

CQ-GESUS-APEX v3 · Primary Prediction

VP.Prodigy 61% (prob 0.608)

Wrong

VP.Prodigy Clutchain

61% 39%

Shadow bet: 9.0u @ 1.691 → -9.0u

CQ-GESUS Suite — 12 Models

TITAN ORACLE NEXUS PHANTOM MIRAGE SPECTER CIPHER CLUTCH UTILITY PISTOL SYNERGY

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	VP.Prodigy	vs	Clutchain	Edge
mirage	43% (12/28)		100% (1/1)	-57pp
inferno	50% (3/6)		0% (0/1)	+50pp
dust2	43% (19/44)		0% (0/2)	+43pp
ancient	42% (17/40)		67% (2/3)	-25pp
nuke	45% (18/40)		67% (2/3)	-22pp
anubis	64% (18/28)		50% (1/2)	+14pp
overpass	50% (9/18)	·	—
vertigo	57% (4/7)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Per-Map Win Probability

mirage

30%

70%

Clutchain

inferno

100%

VP.Prodigy

dust2

100%

VP.Prodigy

ancient

39%

61%

Clutchain

nuke

40%

60%

Clutchain

anubis

56%

44%

VP.Prodigy

Veto simulation requires ≥4 maps with data for both teams (min. 3 maps played each).

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
VP.Prodigy
MVP lasfas	73	44	12	33%	113.7	76.2%	1.63	—
TriBorgg1 RIFLER	67	48	24	57%	107.6	72.5%	1.44	5.1
prrincee	55	50	12	62%	91.5	62.1%	1.14	—
rokilan	42	53	27	50%	70.7	66.7%	0.93	—
Stoynes	26	54	17	62%	53.8	54.0%	0.56	—
Clutchain WIN
MVP Python0255	66	48	10	47%	100.6	67.2%	1.36	—
_SHOGU	56	49	12	57%	83.5	73.1%	1.21	—
ScreaM ENTRY	41	54	19	71%	84.1	59.4%	0.90	—
Nivera-	44	55	20	36%	70.1	55.1%	0.84	—
Kyojin RIFLER	38	57	22	45%	69.9	60.3%	0.79	5.9

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
VP.Prodigy
Tri-Borgg1	27	15	9	56%	116.8	66.7%	1.60	5.1
lasfas	26	19	4	46%	105.9	75.0%	1.48	—
prrincee	18	20	5	44%	83.4	58.3%	0.98	—
Stoynes	13	19	7	85%	82.7	68.2%	0.91	—
rokilan	11	20	7	55%	55.8	56.0%	0.63	—
Clutchain WIN
_SHOGU	27	20	4	52%	92.4	76.0%	1.44	—
Nivera-	22	19	11	36%	98.3	72.0%	1.30	—
Python0255	21	18	5	48%	100.1	69.6%	1.28	—
ScreaM	14	20	7	79%	78.6	60.9%	0.85	—
Kyojin	12	22	9	33%	67.0	65.2%	0.73	5.9

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
VP.Prodigy WIN
lasfas	24	10	6	13%	138.2	88.2%	2.09	—
Tri-Borgg1	29	14	8	62%	133.1	84.0%	1.84	5.1
prrincee	17	14	4	59%	85.8	65.0%	1.19	—
rokilan	18	17	9	44%	82.8	63.6%	1.13	—
Stoynes	6	16	7	33%	34.5	50.0%	0.41	—
Clutchain
Python0255	17	18	3	47%	78.4	56.5%	0.96	—
_SHOGU	13	17	5	54%	65.9	60.9%	0.83	—
Kyojin	13	18	7	46%	69.8	52.2%	0.77	5.9
Nivera-	13	19	7	23%	59.8	50.0%	0.69	—
ScreaM	9	17	6	67%	74.4	47.4%	0.61	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
VP.Prodigy
lasfas	23	15	2	39%	103.1	68.2%	1.44	—
prrincee	20	16	3	80%	105.6	63.6%	1.28	—
rokilan	13	16	11	54%	75.4	81.8%	1.07	—
Tri-Borgg1	11	19	7	45%	64.7	65.0%	0.75	5.1
Stoynes	7	19	3	43%	42.0	42.9%	0.33	—
Clutchain WIN
Python0255	28	12	2	46%	125.3	76.2%	1.88	—
_SHOGU	16	12	3	69%	93.3	84.2%	1.38	—
ScreaM	18	17	6	67%	98.1	68.2%	1.20	—
Kyojin	13	17	6	54%	73.0	63.6%	0.89	5.9
Nivera-	9	17	2	56%	47.1	40.0%	0.45	—

Teams

Players in this match

lasfas TriBorgg1 Python0255 _SHOGU prrincee rokilan ScreaM Nivera- Kyojin Stoynes