TYLOO vs 9z — CounterQuant

T1 BO3 CS2 2026-06-08

TYLOO

0 : 2

9z wins

9z Winner

CQ GESUS

1 model →

CQ-GESUS-ORACLE v1 · Primary Prediction

TYLOO 51% (prob 0.513)

Wrong

TYLOO 9z

51% 49%

Why — Top Feature Drivers

Elo edge -0.136 Buy power -0.110 econ defuse rate t1 -0.103

Shadow bet: 1.0u @ 1.957 → -1.0u

CQ-GESUS Suite — 12 Models

TITAN ORACLE NEXUS PHANTOM MIRAGE SPECTER CIPHER CLUTCH UTILITY PISTOL SYNERGY

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	TYLOO	vs	9z	Edge
dust2	0% (0/1)		62% (56/90)	-62pp
anubis	67% (36/54)		42% (19/45)	+25pp
mirage	70% (57/82)		50% (36/72)	+20pp
ancient	50% (37/74)		62% (69/112)	-12pp
overpass	51% (20/39)		62% (43/69)	-11pp
inferno	56% (60/108)		62% (58/94)	-6pp
nuke	60% (40/67)		64% (103/160)	-4pp
vertigo	55% (6/11)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

overpass 51% WR

9z bans

anubis 42% WR

mirage 50% WR

TYLOO pick

nuke

48% — TYLOO favored

Decider

dust2

100% 9z

Decider

vertigo

9z pick

inferno

53% — 9z favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

anubis

61%

39%

TYLOO

mirage

58%

42%

TYLOO

ancient

45%

55%

overpass

45%

55%

inferno

47%

53%

even

nuke

48%

52%

even

TYLOO on left · 9z on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
MVP JamYoung RIFLER	26	33	16	69%	87.8	74.4%	1.05	9.1
Moseyuh RIFLER	30	30	8	40%	79.0	59.0%	1.02	9.1
Jee AWP	24	26	4	38%	74.4	64.7%	0.99	9.3
Mercury RIFLER	19	28	7	84%	66.3	46.9%	0.69	9.1
Zero	19	35	6	63%	57.4	45.0%	0.53	—
9z WIN
MVP dgt RIFLER	40	19	9	45%	112.7	75.7%	1.66	9.8
luchov RIFLER	36	26	16	67%	108.4	71.1%	1.42	9.7
HUASOPEEK RIFLER	31	23	10	61%	84.0	75.7%	1.30	9.7
meyern AWP	23	22	10	48%	75.8	66.7%	1.07	9.7
max RIFLER	23	29	6	35%	62.4	67.6%	0.89	9.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
Jee	16	13	1	25%	83.2	68.4%	1.20	9.3
Moseyuh	18	14	0	44%	90.7	60.0%	1.19	9.1
JamYoung	18	18	6	61%	91.6	72.7%	1.18	9.1
Mercury	10	17	5	80%	67.4	50.0%	0.65	9.1
Zero	7	20	4	71%	50.2	40.9%	0.33	—
9z WIN
dgt	22	11	9	41%	110.4	81.8%	1.65	9.8
meyern	19	14	6	53%	108.6	73.7%	1.45	9.7
HUASOPEEK	13	13	3	54%	72.9	66.7%	1.04	9.7
luchov	14	16	10	71%	92.1	60.0%	1.02	9.7
max	14	15	3	29%	66.5	70.0%	1.01	9.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
JamYoung	8	15	10	88%	82.9	76.5%	0.88	9.1
Moseyuh	12	16	8	33%	66.8	57.9%	0.84	9.1
Zero	12	15	2	58%	66.1	50.0%	0.78	—
Mercury	9	11	2	89%	65.0	42.9%	0.73	9.1
Jee	8	13	3	63%	63.3	60.0%	0.72	9.3
9z WIN
luchov	22	10	6	64%	126.4	83.3%	1.87	9.7
dgt	18	8	0	50%	116.2	66.7%	1.67	9.8
HUASOPEEK	18	10	7	67%	94.4	84.2%	1.55	9.7
max	9	14	3	44%	57.5	64.7%	0.75	9.6
meyern	4	8	4	25%	31.2	57.1%	0.55	9.7

Teams

TYLOO

View team →

Players in this match

dgt luchov HUASOPEEK meyern JamYoung Moseyuh Jee max Mercury Zero