CQ
GESUS
CQ-GESUS-ORACLE v1 · Primary Prediction
BetBoom
55%
(prob 0.550)
Correct
Monte
BetBoom
45%
55%
Why — Top Feature Drivers
wr10 t2
-0.123
econ anti eco wr t1
-0.114
Map-pool Elo
-0.076
Shadow bet: 3.4u @ 1.843
→ 2.9u
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Monte | vs | BetBoom | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59% (34/58) |
|
31% (8/26) | +28pp |
|
|
44% (17/39) |
|
61% (37/61) | -17pp |
|
|
62% (8/13) |
|
50% (2/4) | +12pp |
|
|
53% (56/105) |
|
65% (40/62) | -12pp |
|
|
52% (96/184) |
|
60% (84/139) | -8pp |
|
|
53% (83/158) |
|
60% (72/121) | -7pp |
|
|
56% (96/172) |
|
60% (79/132) | -4pp |
|
|
58% (67/115) |
|
59% (47/80) | -1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Monte bans
BetBoom bans
Monte pick
50% — Monte favored
Decider
53% BetBoom
Decider
52% BetBoom
BetBoom pick
55% — BetBoom favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
Monte
BetBoom
Monte
BetBoom
even
even
even
even
Monte on left ·
BetBoom on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side