CQ
GESUS
CQ-GESUS-ORACLE v1 · Primary Prediction
BetBoom
66%
(prob 0.663)
Correct
BetBoom
M80
66%
34%
Why — Top Feature Drivers
econ full wr t1
+0.403
CT-side econ
+0.192
Schedule strength
+0.103
Shadow bet: 15.4u @ 1.566
→ 8.7u
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | BetBoom | vs | M80 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31% (8/26) |
|
69% (29/42) | -38pp |
|
|
60% (79/132) |
|
47% (8/17) | +13pp |
|
|
60% (72/121) |
|
72% (87/120) | -12pp |
|
|
60% (84/139) |
|
71% (64/90) | -11pp |
|
|
50% (2/4) |
|
60% (50/83) | -10pp |
|
|
65% (40/62) |
|
56% (35/63) | +9pp |
|
|
61% (37/61) |
|
69% (29/42) | -8pp |
|
|
59% (47/80) |
|
59% (38/64) | 0pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
BetBoom bans
M80 bans
BetBoom pick
47% — BetBoom favored
Decider
50% BetBoom
Decider
54% M80
M80 pick
55% — M80 favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
M80
BetBoom
M80
even
M80
even
even
even
BetBoom on left ·
M80 on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side