T1 BO1 CS2 2026-06-06
FUT FUT Winner
1 : 0
FUT wins
CQ GESUS
CQ-GESUS-ORACLE v1 · Primary Prediction
TYLOO 55% (prob 0.550)
Wrong
FUT TYLOO
45% 55%
Why — Top Feature Drivers
Schedule strength -0.138 econ anti eco wr t1 -0.088 Elo edge -0.080
Shadow bet: 3.9u @ 1.843 → -3.9u
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map FUT vs TYLOO Edge
dust2
53% (20/38)
0% (0/1) +53pp
anubis
38% (3/8)
67% (36/54) -29pp
ancient
59% (23/39)
50% (37/74) +9pp
mirage
75% (40/53)
70% (57/82) +5pp
nuke
65% (15/23)
60% (40/67) +5pp
overpass
47% (9/19)
51% (20/39) -4pp
inferno
57% (4/7)
56% (60/108) +1pp
vertigo
· 55% (6/11)
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
FUT bans
anubis 38% WR
overpass 47% WR
TYLOO bans
ancient 50% WR
inferno 56% WR
FUT pick
mirage
52% — FUT favored
Decider
dust2
100% FUT
Decider
vertigo
TYLOO pick
nuke
48% — TYLOO favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100%
0%
FUT
anubis
36%
64%
TYLOO
ancient
54%
46%
even
mirage
52%
48%
even
nuke
52%
48%
even
overpass
48%
52%
even
inferno
50%
50%
even
FUT on left · TYLOO on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.