TYLOO vs Lynn Vision — CounterQuant

T1 BO3 CS2 2026-06-05

TYLOO Winner

2 : 0

TYLOO wins

Lynn Vision

CQ GESUS

1 model →

CQ-GESUS-APEX v3 · Primary Prediction

TYLOO 60% (prob 0.601)

Correct

TYLOO Lynn Vision

60% 40%

Shadow bet: 9.1u @ 1.706 → 6.4u

CQ-GESUS Suite — 12 Models

TITAN ORACLE NEXUS PHANTOM MIRAGE SPECTER CIPHER CLUTCH UTILITY PISTOL SYNERGY

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	TYLOO	vs	Lynn Vision	Edge
dust2	0% (0/1)		70% (61/87)	-70pp
nuke	60% (40/67)		49% (38/78)	+11pp
anubis	67% (36/54)		56% (39/70)	+11pp
overpass	51% (20/39)		62% (20/32)	-11pp
vertigo	55% (6/11)		46% (6/13)	+9pp
ancient	50% (37/74)		58% (48/83)	-8pp
inferno	56% (60/108)		54% (41/76)	+2pp
mirage	70% (57/82)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

overpass 51% WR

Lynn Vision bans

vertigo 46% WR

nuke 49% WR

TYLOO pick

anubis

54% — TYLOO favored

Decider

mirage

Decider

dust2

100% Lynn Vision

Lynn Vision pick

inferno

49% — Lynn Vision favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

Lynn Vision

nuke

55%

45%

TYLOO

anubis

54%

46%

even

overpass

45%

55%

Lynn Vision

vertigo

54%

46%

even

ancient

46%

54%

even

inferno

51%

49%

even

TYLOO on left · Lynn Vision on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
MVP Zero	38	23	10	61%	112.1	73.0%	1.54	—
JamYoung RIFLER	38	22	14	39%	90.2	73.0%	1.49	9.1
Jee AWP	23	21	12	39%	81.9	81.8%	1.22	9.3
Moseyuh RIFLER	24	19	5	54%	89.1	62.1%	1.18	9.1
Mercury RIFLER	17	26	10	53%	50.7	55.9%	0.69	9.1
Lynn Vision
MVP Starry	30	25	8	60%	102.6	65.7%	1.25	—
C4LLM3SU3 RIFLER	23	28	8	61%	73.6	51.4%	0.84	7.9
EmiliaQAQ	23	29	11	43%	71.3	50.0%	0.82	—
z4KR	16	26	10	38%	49.5	55.9%	0.66	—
westmelon	14	31	9	43%	49.2	51.4%	0.50	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
Zero	23	15	5	70%	117.6	71.4%	1.55	—
JamYoung	18	14	6	50%	85.1	68.4%	1.29	9.1
Jee	14	14	7	57%	92.4	82.4%	1.27	9.3
Moseyuh	10	9	3	50%	81.1	71.4%	1.14	9.1
Mercury	11	15	4	55%	48.7	55.6%	0.73	9.1
Lynn Vision
Starry	17	14	5	59%	115.3	77.8%	1.43	—
EmiliaQAQ	18	14	7	44%	92.7	61.1%	1.29	—
C4LLM3SU3	13	15	5	46%	73.9	55.6%	0.91	7.9
z4KR	7	14	6	57%	54.2	52.9%	0.57	—
westmelon	6	17	6	50%	40.3	47.4%	0.36	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
JamYoung	20	8	8	30%	95.7	77.8%	1.70	9.1
Zero	15	8	5	47%	104.8	75.0%	1.52	—
Moseyuh	14	10	2	57%	96.6	53.3%	1.23	9.1
Jee	9	7	5	11%	70.9	81.3%	1.17	9.3
Mercury	6	11	6	50%	53.1	56.3%	0.64	9.1
Lynn Vision
Starry	13	11	3	62%	89.2	52.9%	1.07	—
C4LLM3SU3	10	13	3	80%	73.4	47.1%	0.76	7.9
z4KR	9	12	4	22%	44.9	58.8%	0.74	—
westmelon	8	14	3	38%	58.6	55.6%	0.64	—
EmiliaQAQ	5	15	4	40%	47.2	37.5%	0.28	—

Teams

Players in this match

Zero JamYoung Starry Jee Moseyuh C4LLM3SU3 EmiliaQAQ Mercury z4KR westmelon