CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Monte | vs | Nemesis | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anubis
|
58% (67/115) |
|
0% (0/1) | +58pp |
overpass
|
44% (17/39) |
|
67% (12/18) | -23pp |
mirage
|
52% (96/184) |
|
61% (22/36) | -9pp |
nuke
|
56% (96/172) |
|
64% (28/44) | -8pp |
ancient
|
53% (83/158) |
|
57% (25/44) | -4pp |
dust2
|
53% (56/105) |
|
56% (20/36) | -3pp |
inferno
|
62% (8/13) |
|
61% (17/28) | +1pp |
vertigo
|
59% (34/58) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Monte bans
overpass
44% WR
mirage
52% WR
Nemesis bans
dust2
56% WR
ancient
57% WR
Monte pick
inferno
50% — Monte favored
Decider
anubis
100% Monte
Decider
vertigo
Nemesis pick
nuke
53% — Nemesis favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
Monte
overpass
Nemesis
mirage
even
nuke
even
ancient
even
dust2
even
inferno
even
Monte on left ·
Nemesis on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.