CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | FaZe | vs | TYLOO | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
52% (33/64) |
|
0% (0/1) | +52pp |
|
|
51% (27/53) |
|
67% (36/54) | -16pp |
|
|
64% (69/108) |
|
50% (37/74) | +14pp |
|
|
57% (63/110) |
|
70% (57/82) | -13pp |
|
|
44% (4/9) |
|
55% (6/11) | -11pp |
|
|
42% (21/50) |
|
51% (20/39) | -9pp |
|
|
62% (72/116) |
|
60% (40/67) | +2pp |
|
|
57% (50/88) |
|
56% (60/108) | +1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
FaZe bans
TYLOO bans
FaZe pick
51% — FaZe favored
Decider
57% TYLOO
Decider
100% FaZe
TYLOO pick
55% — TYLOO favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
FaZe
TYLOO
FaZe
TYLOO
TYLOO
TYLOO
even
even
FaZe on left ·
TYLOO on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.