ENCE vs Entropy — CounterQuant

T2 BO3 CS2 2026-06-04

ENCE Winner

2 : 1

ENCE wins

Entropy

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	ENCE	vs	Entropy	Edge
nuke	57% (67/118)		0% (0/2)	+57pp
overpass	47% (21/45)		20% (1/5)	+27pp
inferno	18% (3/17)		43% (3/7)	-25pp
dust2	60% (53/88)		50% (1/2)	+10pp
anubis	57% (50/88)		50% (4/8)	+7pp
ancient	54% (73/136)		50% (4/8)	+4pp
mirage	49% (51/104)		50% (5/10)	-1pp
vertigo	67% (33/49)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

ENCE bans

inferno 18% WR

mirage 49% WR

Entropy bans

overpass 20% WR

anubis 50% WR

ENCE pick

ancient

52% — ENCE favored

Decider

nuke

100% ENCE

Decider

vertigo

Entropy pick

dust2

45% — Entropy favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

nuke

100%

ENCE

overpass

70%

30%

ENCE

inferno

30%

70%

Entropy

dust2

55%

45%

ENCE

anubis

53%

47%

even

ancient

52%

48%

even

mirage

49%

51%

even

ENCE on left · Entropy on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE WIN
MVP millert AWP	66	55	16	26%	84.4	69.4%	1.18	3.6
teme RIFLER	65	53	18	49%	76.6	71.8%	1.18	4.0
Cliqq	61	56	21	54%	80.9	69.4%	1.12	—
Schwarz RIFLER	53	61	23	55%	81.9	64.7%	0.98	5.8
HENU RIFLER	47	61	21	53%	70.7	61.2%	0.85	3.5
Entropy
MVP Flaw	55	58	23	56%	85.4	69.4%	1.06	—
rafftu	61	60	14	48%	82.3	64.7%	1.06	—
Mikanix	57	59	18	58%	84.3	65.9%	1.04	—
GeGo	49	57	21	59%	72.2	71.8%	0.98	—
Tevsii	51	53	4	37%	62.7	61.2%	0.90	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE
teme	19	15	2	53%	69.6	77.8%	1.17	4.0
Schwarz	17	19	6	71%	90.0	55.6%	0.95	5.8
millert	15	18	2	20%	59.8	59.3%	0.82	3.6
Cliqq	15	22	7	47%	69.9	59.3%	0.79	—
HENU	12	23	8	42%	59.3	51.9%	0.59	3.5
Entropy WIN
rafftu	23	19	4	39%	86.7	70.4%	1.23	—
Flaw	18	14	8	50%	84.2	77.8%	1.23	—
GeGo	18	16	7	72%	78.9	81.5%	1.20	—
Mikanix	20	16	4	60%	85.9	66.7%	1.16	—
Tevsii	16	13	1	31%	59.5	74.1%	1.05	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE WIN
millert	27	15	6	30%	100.2	75.0%	1.50	3.6
Cliqq	20	15	9	60%	84.0	82.1%	1.29	—
HENU	16	16	9	50%	75.3	71.4%	1.05	3.5
teme	19	17	3	42%	58.7	64.3%	0.99	4.0
Schwarz	16	20	8	50%	76.0	64.3%	0.92	5.8
Entropy
Mikanix	16	18	5	44%	73.0	64.3%	0.93	—
GeGo	14	18	6	64%	65.2	75.0%	0.93	—
rafftu	16	18	4	50%	80.8	53.6%	0.88	—
Flaw	15	21	5	53%	75.2	53.6%	0.77	—
Tevsii	14	18	1	21%	58.9	53.6%	0.73	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ENCE WIN
teme	27	21	13	52%	99.7	73.3%	1.36	4.0
Cliqq	26	19	5	54%	87.9	66.7%	1.26	—
millert	24	22	8	25%	91.7	73.3%	1.22	3.6
Schwarz	20	22	9	45%	80.1	73.3%	1.07	5.8
HENU	19	22	4	63%	76.8	60.0%	0.92	3.5
Entropy
Flaw	22	23	10	64%	96.0	76.7%	1.19	—
rafftu	22	23	6	55%	79.9	70.0%	1.07	—
Mikanix	21	25	9	67%	93.4	66.7%	1.04	—
Tevsii	21	22	2	52%	69.1	56.7%	0.92	—
GeGo	17	23	8	41%	72.7	60.0%	0.84	—

Teams

Players in this match

millert teme Cliqq Flaw rafftu Mikanix GeGo Schwarz Tevsii HENU