M1Z vs GENESIS — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-30

M1Z

1 : 2

GENESIS wins

GENESIS Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	M1Z	vs	GENESIS	Edge
mirage	67% (2/3)		0% (0/2)	+67pp
anubis	0% (0/1)		60% (3/5)	-60pp
dust2	0% (0/3)		50% (1/2)	-50pp
inferno	0% (0/1)		33% (1/3)	-33pp
ancient	50% (2/4)		40% (2/5)	+10pp
nuke	—	·	—
overpass	—	·	0% (0/1)
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Per-Map Win Probability

mirage

100%

M1Z

anubis

100%

GENESIS

dust2

100%

GENESIS

inferno

100%

GENESIS

ancient

56%

44%

M1Z

Veto simulation requires ≥4 maps with data for both teams (min. 3 maps played each).

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M1Z
MVP zteeek	57	43	17	40%	97.9	73.2%	1.30	—
Freesies	46	47	24	59%	78.6	76.1%	1.11	—
xezr	54	51	13	37%	79.2	64.8%	1.08	—
Ancient	49	47	23	45%	81.7	64.8%	1.07	—
Styx	45	46	22	60%	79.1	71.8%	1.07	—
GENESIS WIN
MVP Cuba	52	55	26	50%	89.2	64.8%	1.08	—
M4rdik	52	52	16	65%	86.5	63.4%	1.07	—
-neaQ	49	45	12	39%	77.1	64.8%	1.06	—
kapa	40	51	21	53%	77.9	62.0%	0.90	—
Kirikuõpetaja	40	48	15	53%	75.8	57.8%	0.87	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M1Z
Freesies	21	17	6	76%	95.4	79.2%	1.35	—
zteeek	18	14	7	33%	99.0	66.7%	1.23	—
Styx	15	14	7	40%	79.6	83.3%	1.18	—
Ancient	18	18	7	39%	75.2	62.5%	1.04	—
xezr	12	18	5	25%	55.5	54.2%	0.69	—
GENESIS WIN
M4rdik	25	17	5	60%	120.2	70.8%	1.51	—
-neaQ	20	14	2	45%	85.8	62.5%	1.21	—
kapa	12	18	5	42%	67.1	58.3%	0.76	—
Kirikuõpetaja	12	16	3	75%	65.3	54.2%	0.76	—
Cuba	12	20	9	50%	75.7	54.2%	0.72	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M1Z WIN
xezr	26	16	3	46%	108.3	75.0%	1.55	—
zteeek	20	13	6	45%	105.8	79.2%	1.44	—
Ancient	18	11	9	44%	87.0	75.0%	1.33	—
Styx	15	15	8	80%	74.6	79.2%	1.12	—
Freesies	13	15	12	38%	81.2	75.0%	1.05	—
GENESIS
Cuba	19	20	6	47%	80.8	62.5%	1.04	—
-neaQ	14	15	5	29%	66.3	66.7%	0.95	—
Kirikuõpetaja	14	17	9	50%	84.3	54.2%	0.89	—
M4rdik	13	21	9	77%	81.1	58.3%	0.79	—
kapa	10	19	6	70%	65.5	50.0%	0.60	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
M1Z
zteeek	19	16	4	42%	88.5	73.9%	1.25	—
xezr	16	17	5	31%	73.5	65.2%	1.00	—
Freesies	12	15	6	50%	58.4	73.9%	0.92	—
Styx	15	17	7	60%	83.4	52.2%	0.91	—
Ancient	13	18	7	54%	82.8	56.5%	0.84	—
GENESIS WIN
Cuba	21	15	11	52%	112.2	78.3%	1.48	—
kapa	18	14	10	50%	102.0	78.3%	1.36	—
-neaQ	15	16	5	40%	79.4	65.2%	1.01	—
Kirikuõpetaja	14	15	3	36%	78.0	65.2%	0.98	—
M4rdik	14	14	2	64%	56.9	60.9%	0.90	—

Teams

Players in this match

zteeek Freesies xezr Cuba Ancient Styx M4rdik -neaQ kapa Kirikuõpetaja