MANA vs INOX Division — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-31

MANA

0 : 2

INOX Division wins

INOX Division Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	MANA	vs	INOX Division	Edge
nuke	29% (7/24)		81% (13/16)	-52pp
ancient	38% (20/52)		86% (6/7)	-48pp
dust2	56% (39/70)		87% (13/15)	-31pp
anubis	22% (2/9)		40% (2/5)	-18pp
overpass	43% (6/14)		60% (6/10)	-17pp
inferno	64% (21/33)		69% (9/13)	-5pp
mirage	54% (31/57)	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

MANA bans

anubis 22% WR

nuke 29% WR

INOX Division bans

overpass 60% WR

inferno 69% WR

MANA pick

dust2

39% — MANA favored

Decider

mirage

Decider

vertigo

INOX Division pick

ancient

69% — INOX Division favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

nuke

26%

74%

INOX Division

ancient

31%

69%

INOX Division

dust2

39%

61%

INOX Division

anubis

35%

65%

INOX Division

overpass

42%

58%

INOX Division

inferno

48%

52%

even

MANA on left · INOX Division on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MANA
MVP xonn1k	26	31	10	58%	74.0	57.1%	0.88	—
cerber RIFLER	25	34	9	72%	74.0	45.2%	0.73	4.1
arbnorz	24	38	6	63%	73.4	54.8%	0.72	—
ammar	19	32	6	63%	58.7	47.6%	0.60	—
BledarD	17	32	6	29%	56.6	50.0%	0.57	—
INOX Division WIN
MVP FenomeN AWP	39	22	10	26%	100.9	81.0%	1.52	8.1
k0s	40	24	8	43%	102.2	71.4%	1.45	—
finW	31	20	9	58%	84.6	81.0%	1.33	—
gooddeph	32	24	17	72%	92.7	71.4%	1.27	—
k1slll	28	24	10	54%	79.2	71.4%	1.13	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MANA
xonn1k	12	15	6	50%	82.6	61.1%	0.94	—
BledarD	8	12	3	25%	57.1	61.1%	0.74	—
ammar	9	14	2	56%	59.1	38.9%	0.56	—
arbnorz	7	18	2	86%	59.6	38.9%	0.35	—
cerber	4	16	4	50%	30.6	38.9%	0.18	4.1
INOX Division WIN
k0s	23	8	2	48%	132.9	72.2%	1.89	—
finW	16	6	4	63%	96.1	88.9%	1.63	—
Fenomen	14	9	4	14%	90.1	83.3%	1.39	8.1
gooddeph	12	10	11	75%	89.3	83.3%	1.30	—
k1slll	11	8	5	27%	71.2	88.9%	1.26	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
MANA
cerber	21	18	5	76%	106.6	50.0%	1.15	4.1
arbnorz	17	20	4	53%	83.8	66.7%	1.00	—
xonn1k	14	16	4	64%	67.5	54.2%	0.84	—
ammar	10	18	4	70%	58.3	54.2%	0.62	—
BledarD	9	20	3	33%	56.1	41.7%	0.44	—
INOX Division WIN
Fenomen	25	13	6	32%	109.0	79.2%	1.63	8.1
gooddeph	20	14	6	70%	95.3	62.5%	1.26	—
k0s	17	16	6	35%	79.2	70.8%	1.11	—
finW	15	14	5	53%	76.0	75.0%	1.10	—
k1slll	17	16	5	71%	85.3	58.3%	1.04	—

Teams

Players in this match

FenomeN k0s finW gooddeph k1slll xonn1k cerber arbnorz ammar BledarD