RUSTEC vs Young Ninjas — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-31

RUSTEC Winner

2 : 1

RUSTEC wins

Young Ninjas

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	RUSTEC	Young Ninjas	Edge
inferno	80% (4/5)	33% (4/12)	+47pp
vertigo	100% (1/1)	71% (25/35)	+29pp
anubis	30% (3/10)	47% (14/30)	-17pp
mirage	40% (6/15)	54% (27/50)	-14pp
dust2	46% (13/28)	58% (29/50)	-12pp
ancient	38% (5/13)	49% (30/61)	-11pp
nuke	43% (9/21)	52% (16/31)	-9pp
overpass	73% (11/15)	72% (18/25)	+1pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

RUSTEC bans

anubis 30% WR

ancient 38% WR

Young Ninjas bans

inferno 33% WR

nuke 52% WR

RUSTEC pick

overpass

50% — RUSTEC favored

Decider

mirage

57% Young Ninjas

Decider

vertigo

58% RUSTEC

Young Ninjas pick

dust2

56% — Young Ninjas favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

71%

29%

RUSTEC

vertigo

58%

42%

RUSTEC

anubis

39%

61%

Young Ninjas

mirage

43%

57%

Young Ninjas

dust2

44%

56%

Young Ninjas

ancient

44%

56%

Young Ninjas

nuke

45%

55%

Young Ninjas

overpass

50%

even

RUSTEC on left · Young Ninjas on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
RUSTEC WIN
MVP anttzz RIFLER	70	49	22	63%	88.2	69.8%	1.28	4.6
Brilliance	72	61	21	51%	94.0	70.9%	1.25	—
youka AWP	57	49	22	25%	78.0	72.1%	1.13	6.4
jakekeS	62	60	30	65%	86.4	68.6%	1.13	—
supra RIFLER	63	57	21	65%	83.0	66.3%	1.12	5.3
Young Ninjas
MVP rud	72	63	16	26%	93.0	68.6%	1.21	—
n0te	59	70	14	68%	81.2	59.3%	0.93	—
joeski	53	66	18	49%	72.7	59.3%	0.87	—
mASKED	48	69	26	44%	76.1	61.6%	0.84	—
tein	44	58	13	57%	58.6	57.0%	0.76	—
▸ Observers / Coaches (2)
hitori	— observer —
tAk	— observer —

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
RUSTEC
anttzz	30	19	3	70%	96.8	65.5%	1.41	4.6
Brilliance	23	20	6	57%	98.3	65.5%	1.19	—
jakekeS	17	19	12	59%	67.5	69.0%	0.98	—
supra	16	20	6	75%	74.1	72.4%	0.96	5.3
youka	16	22	10	25%	77.6	62.1%	0.87	6.4
Young Ninjas WIN
rud	26	21	7	46%	98.0	79.3%	1.37	—
n0te	28	24	6	75%	109.3	72.4%	1.35	—
tein	17	16	2	59%	63.5	65.5%	0.96	—
joeski	19	25	9	53%	82.9	55.2%	0.87	—
mASKED	14	21	5	21%	55.0	58.6%	0.71	—
▸ Observers (2)
hitori	— observer —
tAk	— observer —

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
RUSTEC WIN
youka	14	4	4	21%	93.6	81.3%	1.60	6.4
Brilliance	15	10	7	47%	88.3	93.8%	1.55	—
anttzz	12	5	7	58%	87.2	87.5%	1.51	4.6
supra	15	9	4	80%	98.1	75.0%	1.46	5.3
jakekeS	14	10	5	79%	99.4	56.3%	1.24	—
Young Ninjas
mASKED	14	14	4	43%	122.1	68.8%	1.27	—
rud	11	13	3	18%	91.1	62.5%	0.99	—
joeski	5	11	2	60%	36.0	62.5%	0.55	—
n0te	5	15	1	60%	39.7	37.5%	0.24	—
tein	1	15	2	0%	11.4	25.0%	0.00	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
RUSTEC WIN
jakekeS	31	31	13	61%	94.8	73.2%	1.18	—
Brilliance	34	31	8	50%	93.2	65.9%	1.17	—
youka	27	23	8	26%	72.2	75.6%	1.13	6.4
anttzz	28	25	12	57%	82.6	65.9%	1.10	4.6
supra	32	28	11	53%	83.4	58.5%	1.09	5.3
Young Ninjas
rud	35	29	6	14%	90.1	63.4%	1.19	—
joeski	29	30	7	45%	79.8	61.0%	1.00	—
tein	26	27	9	58%	73.5	63.4%	0.98	—
n0te	26	31	7	62%	77.5	58.5%	0.90	—
mASKED	20	34	17	60%	73.1	61.0%	0.76	—

Teams

Players in this match

anttzz Brilliance rud youka jakekeS supra n0te joeski mASKED tein