CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Marsborne | vs | LAG | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
68% (17/25) |
|
39% (17/44) | +29pp |
|
|
66% (19/29) |
|
39% (19/49) | +27pp |
|
|
44% (19/43) |
|
57% (26/46) | -13pp |
|
|
72% (59/82) |
|
65% (47/72) | +7pp |
|
|
46% (13/28) |
|
53% (8/15) | -7pp |
|
|
58% (42/73) |
|
56% (50/89) | +2pp |
|
|
60% (29/48) |
|
60% (26/43) | 0pp |
|
|
— | · | 48% (10/21) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Marsborne bans
LAG bans
Marsborne pick
53% — Marsborne favored
Decider
51% Marsborne
Decider
LAG pick
50% — LAG favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
Marsborne
Marsborne
LAG
even
even
even
even
Marsborne on left ·
LAG on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side