Chicken Coop vs F5 — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-30

Chicken Coop Winner

2 : 0

Chicken Coop wins

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Chicken Coop	vs	F5	Edge
dust2	43% (12/28)		0% (0/5)	+43pp
mirage	43% (10/23)		69% (9/13)	-26pp
overpass	69% (9/13)		50% (7/14)	+19pp
inferno	60% (12/20)		45% (5/11)	+15pp
ancient	42% (5/12)		35% (6/17)	+7pp
nuke	42% (17/40)		38% (3/8)	+4pp
anubis	21% (4/19)		25% (1/4)	-4pp
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Chicken Coop bans

anubis 21% WR

ancient 42% WR

F5 bans

dust2 0% WR

nuke 38% WR

Chicken Coop pick

overpass

58% — Chicken Coop favored

Decider

vertigo

Decider

inferno

57% Chicken Coop

F5 pick

mirage

62% — F5 favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

Chicken Coop

mirage

38%

62%

overpass

58%

42%

Chicken Coop

inferno

57%

43%

Chicken Coop

ancient

55%

45%

Chicken Coop

nuke

52%

48%

even

anubis

46%

54%

even

Chicken Coop on left · F5 on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chicken Coop WIN
MVP Fessor	38	19	14	61%	130.6	79.4%	1.77	—
Crisp	29	17	10	52%	94.2	82.4%	1.46	—
REKMEISTER RIFLER	25	14	12	60%	87.6	88.2%	1.44	6.0
jared	33	20	6	27%	95.3	67.7%	1.40	—
Drop	22	21	5	41%	73.9	67.7%	1.04	—
F5
MVP cmrn	21	32	6	57%	70.9	55.9%	0.75	—
neight	20	29	4	55%	71.2	52.9%	0.74	—
kermi	21	29	5	57%	79.3	44.1%	0.73	—
Signal	15	28	5	60%	64.1	44.1%	0.55	—
bones	12	30	8	75%	49.6	47.1%	0.42	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chicken Coop WIN
Fessor	21	11	8	67%	136.1	84.2%	1.80	—
Crisp	20	12	4	55%	108.7	79.0%	1.58	—
rekmeister	15	10	5	60%	88.3	79.0%	1.35	6.0
jared	14	14	1	21%	64.6	63.2%	0.98	—
Drop	11	14	4	36%	69.2	63.2%	0.87	—
F5
kermi	15	16	2	47%	88.0	52.6%	0.97	—
cmrn	14	19	4	57%	73.6	63.2%	0.88	—
neight	12	16	3	50%	71.8	57.9%	0.83	—
Signal	9	15	3	56%	76.4	42.1%	0.62	—
bones	9	16	2	67%	61.8	42.1%	0.54	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Chicken Coop WIN
jared	19	6	5	32%	134.2	73.3%	1.94	—
Fessor	17	8	6	53%	123.7	73.3%	1.73	—
rekmeister	10	4	7	60%	86.7	100.0%	1.55	6.0
Crisp	9	5	6	44%	75.9	86.7%	1.32	—
Drop	11	7	1	45%	79.8	73.3%	1.24	—
F5
neight	8	13	1	63%	70.5	46.7%	0.63	—
cmrn	7	13	2	57%	67.5	46.7%	0.57	—
Signal	6	13	2	67%	48.5	46.7%	0.45	—
kermi	6	13	3	83%	68.3	33.3%	0.43	—
bones	3	14	6	100%	34.2	53.3%	0.28	—

Teams

Chicken Coop

View team →

Players in this match

Fessor Crisp REKMEISTER jared Drop cmrn neight kermi Signal bones