F5 vs absolute cinema — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-30

F5 Winner

2 : 1

F5 wins

absolute cinema

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	F5	vs	absolute cinema	Edge
mirage	69% (9/13)		0% (0/2)	+69pp
overpass	50% (7/14)		100% (1/1)	-50pp
inferno	45% (5/11)		0% (0/1)	+45pp
ancient	35% (6/17)		0% (0/1)	+35pp
nuke	38% (3/8)	·	—
dust2	0% (0/5)	·	—
anubis	25% (1/4)	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Per-Map Win Probability

mirage

100%

overpass

33%

67%

absolute cinema

inferno

100%

ancient

100%

Veto simulation requires ≥4 maps with data for both teams (min. 3 maps played each).

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
F5 WIN
MVP kermi	59	43	23	56%	106.1	73.9%	1.41	—
cmrn	61	41	14	62%	100.7	67.7%	1.37	—
neight	53	48	21	45%	92.8	75.4%	1.25	—
bones	42	43	15	45%	78.9	72.3%	1.07	—
Signal	29	45	25	59%	59.8	64.6%	0.78	—
absolute cinema
MVP puf	54	47	15	54%	94.4	75.4%	1.27	—
Moopy	59	47	12	39%	98.2	64.6%	1.27	—
mira	38	48	13	66%	66.2	58.5%	0.83	—
davd	34	50	19	44%	70.8	64.6%	0.83	—
NICKHALDEN	35	52	18	60%	71.9	56.9%	0.77	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
F5 WIN
kermi	26	14	8	50%	125.4	73.9%	1.69	—
cmrn	21	15	8	43%	101.9	69.6%	1.37	—
neight	16	19	7	44%	87.0	82.6%	1.13	—
bones	16	14	3	50%	74.4	69.6%	1.10	—
Signal	7	18	11	43%	44.7	60.9%	0.54	—
absolute cinema
Moopy	22	16	6	18%	95.5	69.6%	1.36	—
puf	19	17	8	47%	110.7	78.3%	1.34	—
mira	16	17	4	75%	75.9	60.9%	0.97	—
NICKHALDEN	13	18	10	62%	81.4	69.6%	0.94	—
davd	10	18	8	30%	57.0	65.2%	0.71	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
F5
cmrn	22	14	4	68%	96.9	73.9%	1.43	—
kermi	21	18	6	62%	111.2	73.9%	1.36	—
neight	16	18	7	50%	84.0	69.6%	1.05	—
Signal	12	16	4	50%	68.6	65.2%	0.86	—
bones	10	17	6	50%	61.8	73.9%	0.81	—
absolute cinema WIN
puf	18	14	6	39%	78.0	78.3%	1.26	—
davd	18	15	4	44%	96.5	73.9%	1.26	—
Moopy	18	16	4	56%	89.2	60.9%	1.11	—
mira	15	17	4	53%	70.2	65.2%	0.95	—
NICKHALDEN	14	19	5	64%	82.3	56.5%	0.85	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
F5 WIN
neight	21	11	7	43%	110.6	73.7%	1.64	—
bones	16	12	6	38%	105.1	73.7%	1.36	—
cmrn	18	12	2	78%	103.8	57.9%	1.31	—
kermi	12	11	9	58%	76.5	73.7%	1.13	—
Signal	10	11	10	80%	67.5	68.4%	0.98	—
absolute cinema
Moopy	19	15	2	47%	112.3	63.2%	1.34	—
puf	17	16	1	76%	94.6	68.4%	1.19	—
mira	7	14	5	71%	49.6	47.4%	0.52	—
NICKHALDEN	8	15	3	50%	47.9	42.1%	0.48	—
davd	6	17	7	67%	56.5	52.6%	0.46	—

Teams

View team →

absolute cinema

View team →

Players in this match

kermi cmrn puf Moopy neight bones mira davd Signal NICKHALDEN