INOX Division vs UNiTY — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-29

INOX Division

0 : 2

UNiTY wins

UNiTY Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	INOX Division	vs	UNiTY	Edge
dust2	87% (13/15)		30% (14/47)	+57pp
nuke	81% (13/16)		30% (15/50)	+51pp
ancient	86% (6/7)		47% (61/129)	+39pp
overpass	60% (6/10)		43% (12/28)	+17pp
inferno	69% (9/13)		53% (25/47)	+16pp
anubis	40% (2/5)		51% (37/73)	-11pp
mirage	—	·	46% (46/99)
vertigo	—	·	25% (4/16)

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

INOX Division bans

anubis 40% WR

overpass 60% WR

UNiTY bans

dust2 30% WR

nuke 30% WR

INOX Division pick

ancient

65% — INOX Division favored

Decider

mirage

Decider

vertigo

UNiTY pick

inferno

43% — UNiTY favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

74%

26%

INOX Division

nuke

73%

27%

INOX Division

ancient

65%

35%

INOX Division

overpass

58%

42%

INOX Division

inferno

57%

43%

INOX Division

anubis

44%

56%

UNiTY

INOX Division on left · UNiTY on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
INOX Division
MVP FenomeN AWP	41	32	9	27%	102.0	75.0%	1.37	8.1
finW	32	34	8	66%	87.8	68.2%	1.08	—
k1slll	28	35	12	57%	86.8	59.1%	0.92	—
k0s	26	36	12	35%	76.0	68.2%	0.90	—
gooddeph	20	33	8	55%	53.7	54.6%	0.64	—
UNiTY WIN
MVP woozzzi AWP	45	28	10	27%	110.3	72.7%	1.51	4.7
KWERTZZ RIFLER	40	30	10	65%	97.4	68.2%	1.32	4.8
2high	32	31	12	47%	83.0	70.5%	1.12	—
NEOFRAG	31	33	10	58%	81.9	75.0%	1.10	—
M1key	27	31	8	41%	83.6	63.6%	0.97	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
INOX Division
Fenomen	38	18	4	21%	128.9	86.7%	1.90	8.1
finW	22	20	5	73%	88.8	66.7%	1.13	—
k1slll	20	22	10	55%	90.0	70.0%	1.08	—
k0s	16	23	9	19%	73.0	70.0%	0.89	—
gooddeph	15	19	5	53%	55.1	56.7%	0.76	—
UNiTY WIN
woozzzi	25	20	4	32%	89.5	63.3%	1.19	4.7
NEOFRAG	22	24	5	59%	91.1	73.3%	1.11	—
KWERTZZ	24	21	3	63%	79.2	56.7%	1.06	4.8
M1key	20	22	4	50%	88.8	63.3%	1.01	—
2high	13	27	8	46%	66.7	56.7%	0.61	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
INOX Division
finW	10	14	3	50%	85.5	71.4%	0.96	—
k0s	10	13	3	60%	82.5	64.3%	0.94	—
k1slll	8	13	2	63%	79.8	35.7%	0.59	—
gooddeph	5	14	3	60%	50.7	50.0%	0.39	—
Fenomen	3	14	5	100%	44.5	50.0%	0.26	8.1
UNiTY WIN
2high	19	4	4	47%	118.0	100.0%	2.22	—
woozzzi	20	8	6	20%	155.0	92.9%	2.21	4.7
KWERTZZ	16	9	7	69%	136.4	92.9%	1.87	4.8
NEOFRAG	9	9	5	56%	62.0	78.6%	1.08	—
M1key	7	9	4	14%	72.4	64.3%	0.88	—

Teams

Players in this match

woozzzi FenomeN KWERTZZ 2high NEOFRAG finW M1key k1slll k0s gooddeph