HOTU vs Rune Eaters — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-31

HOTU Winner

2 : 1

HOTU wins

Rune Eaters

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	HOTU	vs	Rune Eaters	Edge
inferno	0% (0/4)		67% (4/6)	-67pp
overpass	55% (21/38)		20% (1/5)	+35pp
ancient	65% (57/88)		33% (8/24)	+32pp
nuke	56% (33/59)		25% (3/12)	+31pp
dust2	57% (37/65)		46% (11/24)	+11pp
anubis	57% (21/37)		50% (3/6)	+7pp
mirage	60% (34/57)		55% (16/29)	+5pp
vertigo	22% (2/9)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

HOTU bans

inferno 0% WR

nuke 56% WR

Rune Eaters bans

overpass 20% WR

ancient 33% WR

HOTU pick

mirage

52% — HOTU favored

Decider

dust2

55% HOTU

Decider

vertigo

Rune Eaters pick

anubis

47% — Rune Eaters favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

100%

Rune Eaters

overpass

73%

27%

HOTU

ancient

66%

34%

HOTU

nuke

69%

31%

HOTU

dust2

55%

45%

HOTU

anubis

53%

47%

even

mirage

52%

48%

even

HOTU on left · Rune Eaters on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
HOTU WIN
MVP frontales	54	37	12	33%	93.3	73.0%	1.34	—
n0rb3r7 RIFLER	49	43	16	57%	95.5	66.7%	1.19	8.4
kade0 RIFLER	44	44	15	68%	84.3	63.5%	1.05	5.5
mizu	41	40	9	39%	68.5	63.5%	0.98	—
dwushka RIFLER	36	41	18	56%	71.9	61.9%	0.92	5.7
Rune Eaters
MVP her1tage	48	44	13	54%	88.0	68.3%	1.15	—
kumao RIFLER	43	46	13	56%	79.5	60.3%	0.98	4.0
demente	40	45	16	43%	78.3	63.5%	0.97	—
noni	35	42	11	31%	65.2	61.9%	0.86	—
forkyz ENTRY	36	44	11	44%	61.9	60.3%	0.84	2.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
HOTU WIN
mizu	18	10	2	28%	86.8	70.0%	1.37	—
frontales	16	11	3	38%	83.6	70.0%	1.25	—
kade0	15	15	6	80%	98.6	70.0%	1.17	5.5
n0rb3r7	15	13	6	47%	92.8	60.0%	1.13	8.4
dwushka	11	11	7	55%	70.0	70.0%	1.01	5.7
Rune Eaters
forkyz	14	15	8	43%	79.7	70.0%	1.07	2.6
kumao	15	16	4	33%	85.9	60.0%	1.02	4.0
noni	12	13	2	33%	55.1	60.0%	0.86	—
her1tage	10	15	5	50%	71.5	60.0%	0.79	—
demente	8	15	8	13%	65.9	65.0%	0.73	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
HOTU
frontales	20	16	8	20%	107.7	69.6%	1.33	—
n0rb3r7	19	16	5	53%	97.7	69.6%	1.25	8.4
kade0	14	18	4	64%	69.7	52.2%	0.79	5.5
dwushka	9	15	4	67%	46.4	60.9%	0.66	5.7
mizu	8	18	3	50%	44.9	56.5%	0.51	—
Rune Eaters WIN
her1tage	23	13	6	61%	112.1	91.3%	1.68	—
demente	18	14	6	56%	90.7	65.2%	1.21	—
kumao	18	14	5	78%	86.4	65.2%	1.19	4.0
noni	13	14	5	46%	66.9	60.9%	0.91	—
forkyz	10	14	2	20%	40.0	52.2%	0.63	2.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
HOTU WIN
frontales	18	10	1	44%	86.4	80.0%	1.44	—
kade0	15	11	5	60%	86.8	70.0%	1.23	5.5
n0rb3r7	15	14	5	73%	95.6	70.0%	1.18	8.4
mizu	15	12	4	47%	77.4	65.0%	1.13	—
dwushka	16	15	7	50%	103.1	55.0%	1.12	5.7
Rune Eaters
demente	14	16	2	43%	76.6	60.0%	0.93	—
her1tage	15	16	2	47%	76.6	50.0%	0.90	—
forkyz	12	15	1	67%	69.3	60.0%	0.85	2.6
noni	10	15	4	10%	73.5	65.0%	0.82	—
kumao	10	16	4	50%	65.4	55.0%	0.70	4.0

Teams

Players in this match

frontales n0rb3r7 her1tage kade0 mizu kumao demente dwushka noni forkyz