CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | HOTU | vs | DEPO | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0% (0/4) |
|
80% (4/5) | -80pp |
|
|
55% (21/38) |
|
89% (8/9) | -34pp |
|
|
56% (33/59) |
|
25% (2/8) | +31pp |
|
|
60% (34/57) |
|
40% (8/20) | +20pp |
|
|
57% (37/65) |
|
42% (11/26) | +15pp |
|
|
65% (57/88) |
|
54% (7/13) | +11pp |
|
|
57% (21/37) |
|
60% (3/5) | -3pp |
|
|
22% (2/9) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
HOTU bans
DEPO bans
HOTU pick
55% — HOTU favored
Decider
58% HOTU
Decider
DEPO pick
51% — DEPO favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
DEPO
DEPO
HOTU
HOTU
HOTU
HOTU
even
HOTU on left ·
DEPO on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side