PCIFIC vs Rune Eaters — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-29

PCIFIC

1 : 2

Rune Eaters wins

Rune Eaters Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	PCIFIC	vs	Rune Eaters	Edge
inferno	25% (1/4)		67% (4/6)	-42pp
nuke	50% (1/2)		25% (3/12)	+25pp
mirage	33% (1/3)		55% (16/29)	-22pp
overpass	0% (0/1)		20% (1/5)	-20pp
anubis	67% (2/3)		50% (3/6)	+17pp
dust2	50% (5/10)		46% (11/24)	+4pp
ancient	—	·	33% (8/24)
vertigo	0% (0/1)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

PCIFIC bans

inferno 25% WR

mirage 33% WR

Rune Eaters bans

dust2 46% WR

anubis 50% WR

PCIFIC pick

ancient

Decider

overpass

100% Rune Eaters

Decider

vertigo

Rune Eaters pick

nuke

33% — Rune Eaters favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

27%

73%

Rune Eaters

nuke

67%

33%

PCIFIC

mirage

38%

62%

Rune Eaters

overpass

100%

Rune Eaters

anubis

57%

43%

PCIFIC

dust2

52%

48%

even

PCIFIC on left · Rune Eaters on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PCIFIC
MVP jresy	51	49	23	51%	110.5	70.0%	1.26	—
lugseN	44	40	7	45%	87.0	56.7%	1.04	—
eNs	40	43	16	38%	72.3	61.7%	0.96	—
maxy0y0	28	46	14	71%	61.6	56.7%	0.69	—
scolleN	27	50	10	67%	56.0	55.0%	0.60	—
Rune Eaters WIN
MVP her1tage	58	38	12	62%	107.3	78.3%	1.50	—
demente	54	38	21	54%	106.6	81.7%	1.47	—
kumao RIFLER	46	38	19	54%	97.6	80.0%	1.31	4.0
noni	40	36	18	30%	75.1	68.3%	1.09	—
forkyz ENTRY	29	41	13	38%	60.6	68.3%	0.83	2.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PCIFIC WIN
jresy	26	17	12	50%	145.3	77.3%	1.75	—
scolleN	16	18	8	81%	86.4	77.3%	1.13	—
lugseN	15	12	0	33%	70.7	63.6%	1.05	—
eNs	14	15	8	36%	69.9	68.2%	1.01	—
maxy0y0	12	15	6	67%	64.6	68.2%	0.90	—
Rune Eaters
demente	23	16	6	57%	114.7	77.3%	1.54	—
her1tage	19	19	6	42%	101.7	86.4%	1.33	—
kumao	12	15	9	42%	83.1	86.4%	1.11	4.0
noni	13	17	7	23%	66.7	63.6%	0.87	—
forkyz	9	16	7	44%	60.7	68.2%	0.75	2.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PCIFIC
lugseN	14	14	3	64%	91.0	44.4%	0.95	—
maxy0y0	10	15	2	70%	73.9	50.0%	0.71	—
jresy	8	16	5	50%	81.5	55.6%	0.67	—
eNs	9	15	4	33%	63.1	50.0%	0.64	—
scolleN	6	15	0	33%	41.2	44.4%	0.36	—
Rune Eaters WIN
her1tage	22	9	3	68%	129.1	88.9%	1.93	—
demente	19	9	5	68%	117.0	100.0%	1.84	—
kumao	16	9	8	56%	118.3	77.8%	1.55	4.0
noni	10	10	3	30%	63.0	61.1%	0.91	—
forkyz	8	11	2	38%	49.3	61.1%	0.74	2.6

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
PCIFIC
jresy	17	16	6	53%	98.4	75.0%	1.26	—
eNs	17	13	4	41%	83.4	65.0%	1.21	—
lugseN	15	14	4	40%	101.2	60.0%	1.12	—
maxy0y0	6	16	6	83%	47.4	50.0%	0.44	—
scolleN	5	17	2	60%	35.9	40.0%	0.24	—
Rune Eaters WIN
noni	17	9	8	35%	95.2	80.0%	1.49	—
kumao	18	14	2	61%	94.9	75.0%	1.33	4.0
her1tage	17	10	3	76%	93.9	60.0%	1.28	—
demente	12	13	10	25%	88.3	70.0%	1.08	—
forkyz	12	14	4	33%	70.8	75.0%	1.00	2.6

Teams

Players in this match

her1tage demente kumao jresy noni lugseN eNs forkyz maxy0y0 scolleN