Rune Eaters vs HOTU — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-29

Rune Eaters

1 : 2

HOTU wins

HOTU Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Rune Eaters	vs	HOTU	Edge
inferno	67% (4/6)		0% (0/4)	+67pp
overpass	20% (1/5)		55% (21/38)	-35pp
ancient	33% (8/24)		65% (57/88)	-32pp
nuke	25% (3/12)		56% (33/59)	-31pp
dust2	46% (11/24)		57% (37/65)	-11pp
anubis	50% (3/6)		57% (21/37)	-7pp
mirage	55% (16/29)		60% (34/57)	-5pp
vertigo	—	·	22% (2/9)

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Rune Eaters bans

overpass 20% WR

nuke 25% WR

HOTU bans

inferno 0% WR

dust2 57% WR

Rune Eaters pick

mirage

48% — Rune Eaters favored

Decider

anubis

53% HOTU

Decider

vertigo

HOTU pick

ancient

66% — HOTU favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

100%

Rune Eaters

overpass

27%

73%

HOTU

ancient

34%

66%

HOTU

nuke

31%

69%

HOTU

dust2

45%

55%

HOTU

anubis

47%

53%

even

mirage

48%

52%

even

Rune Eaters on left · HOTU on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Rune Eaters
MVP demente	45	42	14	56%	86.9	71.2%	1.16	—
kumao RIFLER	43	42	10	65%	87.0	69.5%	1.12	4.0
her1tage	42	46	11	55%	82.6	64.4%	1.01	—
forkyz ENTRY	37	42	14	62%	79.2	62.7%	0.96	2.6
noni	32	39	12	38%	64.0	55.9%	0.81	—
HOTU WIN
MVP n0rb3r7 RIFLER	52	38	13	54%	106.2	79.7%	1.42	8.4
mizu	45	39	10	51%	91.0	62.7%	1.13	—
frontales	40	38	9	33%	78.5	71.2%	1.09	—
dwushka RIFLER	43	47	10	58%	91.1	66.1%	1.06	5.7
kade0 RIFLER	33	44	15	64%	60.4	61.0%	0.81	5.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Rune Eaters
her1tage	20	16	6	45%	100.3	71.4%	1.35	—
kumao	16	14	4	69%	91.7	71.4%	1.20	4.0
demente	11	14	3	45%	65.4	61.9%	0.83	—
forkyz	12	15	4	83%	74.2	52.4%	0.81	2.6
noni	10	17	4	60%	52.8	42.9%	0.54	—
HOTU WIN
frontales	18	12	6	39%	92.3	81.0%	1.41	—
n0rb3r7	16	12	6	81%	96.7	85.7%	1.38	8.4
mizu	17	13	2	29%	96.2	61.9%	1.20	—
dwushka	15	17	5	60%	86.8	66.7%	1.04	5.7
kade0	11	16	5	82%	59.6	57.1%	0.74	5.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Rune Eaters WIN
demente	20	12	5	60%	123.4	82.4%	1.73	—
noni	13	7	5	15%	97.6	70.6%	1.36	—
her1tage	12	13	3	67%	87.2	70.6%	1.08	—
forkyz	10	10	6	40%	77.5	70.6%	1.06	2.6
kumao	7	13	3	71%	52.4	58.8%	0.62	4.0
HOTU
n0rb3r7	18	13	2	44%	127.4	64.7%	1.46	8.4
dwushka	13	14	0	69%	87.4	70.6%	1.08	5.7
frontales	8	12	2	25%	65.2	70.6%	0.83	—
mizu	9	13	2	67%	58.2	58.8%	0.74	—
kade0	8	15	5	50%	52.7	58.8%	0.63	5.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Rune Eaters
kumao	20	15	3	60%	110.5	76.2%	1.43	4.0
demente	14	16	6	57%	78.9	71.4%	1.03	—
forkyz	15	17	4	60%	85.5	66.7%	1.03	2.6
noni	9	15	3	44%	48.0	57.1%	0.64	—
her1tage	10	17	2	60%	61.1	52.4%	0.63	—
HOTU WIN
n0rb3r7	18	13	5	39%	98.5	85.7%	1.44	8.4
mizu	19	13	6	63%	112.4	66.7%	1.39	—
dwushka	15	16	5	47%	98.3	61.9%	1.06	5.7
kade0	14	13	5	57%	67.3	66.7%	1.03	5.5
frontales	14	14	1	29%	75.5	61.9%	0.98	—

Teams

Players in this match

n0rb3r7 demente mizu kumao frontales dwushka her1tage forkyz noni kade0