CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | ENCE | vs | cirahvi | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18% (3/17) |
|
100% (2/2) | -82pp |
|
|
54% (73/136) |
|
0% (0/1) | +54pp |
|
|
47% (21/45) |
|
0% (0/2) | +47pp |
|
|
49% (51/104) |
|
33% (1/3) | +16pp |
|
|
57% (67/118) |
|
67% (2/3) | -10pp |
|
|
60% (53/88) | · | — | |
|
|
57% (50/88) | · | — | |
|
|
67% (33/49) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Per-Map Win Probability
cirahvi
ENCE
ENCE
ENCE
even
Veto simulation requires ≥4 maps with data for both teams (min. 3 maps played each).
Side