BESTIA vs LP — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-31

BESTIA

1 : 2

LP wins

LP Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	BESTIA	vs	LP	Edge
nuke	57% (62/108)		76% (26/34)	-19pp
mirage	60% (73/121)		48% (15/31)	+12pp
ancient	52% (65/124)		64% (21/33)	-12pp
inferno	60% (84/139)		67% (30/45)	-7pp
dust2	62% (58/93)		66% (27/41)	-4pp
overpass	63% (27/43)		62% (5/8)	+1pp
anubis	56% (59/105)	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

BESTIA bans

ancient 52% WR

nuke 57% WR

LP bans

mirage 48% WR

overpass 62% WR

BESTIA pick

dust2

48% — BESTIA favored

Decider

anubis

Decider

vertigo

LP pick

inferno

53% — LP favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

nuke

43%

57%

mirage

56%

44%

BESTIA

ancient

45%

55%

inferno

47%

53%

even

dust2

48%

52%

even

overpass

50%

even

BESTIA on left · LP on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
BESTIA
MVP cass1n	46	39	17	43%	84.8	75.4%	1.20	—
timo	46	42	13	61%	88.3	66.2%	1.11	—
tomaszin	39	42	15	51%	80.3	70.8%	1.03	—
buda	43	46	18	51%	81.7	61.5%	0.99	—
nacho	26	42	7	65%	56.1	64.6%	0.73	—
LP WIN
MVP Alisson	56	37	11	52%	89.9	72.3%	1.34	—
divine	39	37	12	36%	70.4	70.8%	1.04	—
happ	41	39	14	51%	76.9	66.2%	1.04	—
zmb	40	43	21	45%	76.6	63.1%	0.98	—
Leomonster ENTRY	35	47	16	57%	70.3	63.1%	0.85	7.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
BESTIA
cass1n	24	19	12	54%	97.1	80.0%	1.35	—
buda	20	21	6	65%	85.7	60.0%	1.00	—
tomaszin	18	20	6	56%	75.2	70.0%	1.00	—
timo	15	21	4	53%	67.8	56.7%	0.77	—
nacho	11	20	3	73%	58.1	56.7%	0.63	—
LP WIN
happ	25	17	4	48%	91.9	66.7%	1.27	—
divine	22	16	6	36%	81.8	76.7%	1.25	—
Alisson	21	15	5	71%	82.7	70.0%	1.19	—
zmb	18	20	11	56%	85.3	63.3%	1.00	—
Leomonster	14	21	9	71%	65.6	63.3%	0.79	7.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
BESTIA WIN
timo	15	7	6	73%	120.4	86.7%	1.74	—
cass1n	13	6	4	38%	92.1	100.0%	1.65	—
tomaszin	12	7	4	25%	103.0	80.0%	1.44	—
buda	15	10	7	47%	100.9	66.7%	1.43	—
nacho	3	10	4	67%	33.9	73.3%	0.55	—
LP
divine	10	11	1	30%	84.1	66.7%	1.01	—
Alisson	11	11	1	36%	65.4	66.7%	1.01	—
happ	8	12	2	75%	66.1	53.3%	0.71	—
Leomonster	6	13	2	33%	63.0	53.3%	0.55	7.2
zmb	5	12	6	40%	44.6	53.3%	0.50	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
BESTIA
timo	16	14	3	56%	94.8	65.0%	1.17	—
nacho	12	12	0	58%	69.8	70.0%	1.00	—
tomaszin	9	15	5	78%	70.9	65.0%	0.78	—
buda	8	15	5	25%	61.2	60.0%	0.67	—
cass1n	9	14	1	22%	60.9	50.0%	0.64	—
LP WIN
Alisson	24	11	5	42%	119.0	80.0%	1.80	—
zmb	17	11	4	35%	87.4	70.0%	1.31	—
Leomonster	15	13	5	53%	82.9	70.0%	1.16	7.2
happ	8	10	8	38%	62.4	75.0%	0.93	—
divine	7	10	5	43%	42.9	65.0%	0.73	—

Teams

BESTIA

View team →

Players in this match

Alisson cass1n timo divine happ tomaszin buda zmb Leomonster nacho