TYLOO vs SemperFi — CounterQuant

T2 BO5 CS2 2026-05-28

TYLOO Winner

3 : 0

TYLOO wins

SemperFi

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	TYLOO	vs	SemperFi	Edge
dust2	0% (0/1)		71% (24/34)	-71pp
ancient	50% (37/74)		59% (17/29)	-9pp
overpass	51% (20/39)		57% (8/14)	-6pp
anubis	67% (36/54)		62% (10/16)	+5pp
nuke	60% (40/67)		64% (27/42)	-4pp
inferno	56% (60/108)		60% (28/47)	-4pp
mirage	70% (57/82)		73% (44/60)	-3pp
vertigo	55% (6/11)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

inferno 56% WR

SemperFi bans

overpass 57% WR

anubis 62% WR

TYLOO pick

mirage

49% — TYLOO favored

Decider

dust2

100% SemperFi

Decider

vertigo

SemperFi pick

nuke

52% — SemperFi favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

SemperFi

ancient

46%

54%

even

overpass

47%

53%

even

anubis

52%

48%

even

nuke

48%

52%

even

inferno

48%

52%

even

mirage

49%

51%

even

TYLOO on left · SemperFi on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
MVP Jee AWP	62	37	17	31%	102.5	72.1%	1.44	9.3
JamYoung RIFLER	57	44	12	54%	89.6	72.1%	1.27	9.1
Mercury RIFLER	51	42	17	57%	82.8	76.5%	1.23	9.1
Moseyuh RIFLER	47	43	16	64%	78.0	70.6%	1.11	9.1
Zero	39	48	13	64%	65.6	67.7%	0.90	—
SemperFi
MVP keen	51	48	12	31%	82.4	63.2%	1.08	—
sliimey RIFLER	46	47	19	52%	85.7	66.2%	1.06	7.8
Shadiy	36	54	18	56%	66.5	60.3%	0.78	—
hazr	39	54	10	56%	64.3	55.9%	0.76	—
SaVage	42	56	6	62%	65.6	47.1%	0.72	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
Jee	31	10	6	26%	160.9	81.0%	2.22	9.3
JamYoung	23	12	4	65%	105.2	81.0%	1.65	9.1
Zero	14	18	7	71%	91.8	71.4%	1.03	—
Mercury	9	11	3	56%	49.2	66.7%	0.81	9.1
Moseyuh	8	15	6	50%	56.8	61.9%	0.67	9.1
SemperFi
Shadiy	15	16	5	53%	85.8	57.1%	0.99	—
sliimey	14	17	7	64%	93.7	57.1%	0.96	7.8
hazr	14	18	2	64%	70.7	47.6%	0.76	—
keen	11	18	5	55%	63.7	52.4%	0.67	—
SaVage	12	17	1	83%	62.2	38.1%	0.61	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
Mercury	23	17	6	57%	97.6	87.5%	1.49	9.1
Moseyuh	17	16	3	53%	66.5	70.8%	1.06	9.1
JamYoung	16	18	3	44%	68.8	62.5%	0.93	9.1
Zero	15	16	2	67%	54.6	62.5%	0.89	—
Jee	14	15	5	21%	59.8	58.3%	0.87	9.3
SemperFi
keen	24	15	3	29%	93.7	75.0%	1.45	—
sliimey	17	15	4	65%	83.1	66.7%	1.11	7.8
hazr	14	17	6	57%	73.2	70.8%	0.96	—
SaVage	15	19	1	47%	60.8	54.2%	0.77	—
Shadiy	10	19	6	60%	52.5	58.3%	0.62	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
Moseyuh	22	12	7	77%	109.3	78.3%	1.56	9.1
Mercury	19	14	8	58%	98.1	73.9%	1.34	9.1
Jee	17	12	6	47%	93.9	78.3%	1.32	9.3
JamYoung	18	14	5	50%	97.1	73.9%	1.29	9.1
Zero	10	14	4	50%	53.3	69.6%	0.81	—
SemperFi
sliimey	15	15	8	27%	80.9	73.9%	1.11	7.8
keen	16	15	4	19%	87.6	60.9%	1.06	—
SaVage	15	20	4	60%	73.8	47.8%	0.76	—
Shadiy	11	19	7	55%	63.4	65.2%	0.74	—
hazr	11	19	2	45%	49.4	47.8%	0.55	—

Teams

Players in this match

Jee JamYoung Mercury Moseyuh keen sliimey Zero Shadiy hazr SaVage