T1 BO3 CS2 2026-06-04
MIBR MIBR Winner
2 : 0
MIBR wins
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map MIBR vs Lynn Vision Edge
dust2
38% (3/8)
70% (61/87) -32pp
overpass
47% (14/30)
62% (20/32) -15pp
vertigo
60% (49/82)
46% (6/13) +14pp
inferno
66% (63/96)
54% (41/76) +12pp
nuke
59% (72/122)
49% (38/78) +10pp
ancient
65% (72/111)
58% (48/83) +7pp
anubis
63% (69/109)
56% (39/70) +7pp
mirage
47% (43/91) ·
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR bans
dust2 38% WR
overpass 47% WR
Lynn Vision bans
vertigo 46% WR
nuke 49% WR
MIBR pick
inferno
55% — MIBR favored
Decider
mirage
Decider
anubis
53% MIBR
Lynn Vision pick
ancient
47% — Lynn Vision favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
35%
65%
Lynn Vision
overpass
43%
57%
Lynn Vision
vertigo
57%
43%
MIBR
inferno
55%
45%
MIBR
nuke
55%
45%
MIBR
ancient
53%
47%
even
anubis
53%
47%
even
MIBR on left · Lynn Vision on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.