TYLOO vs Sharks — CounterQuant

T1 BO3 CS2 2026-06-04

TYLOO Winner

2 : 1

TYLOO wins

Sharks

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	TYLOO	Sharks	Edge
dust2	0% (0/1)	75% (6/8)	-75pp
mirage	70% (57/82)	50% (66/133)	+20pp
ancient	50% (37/74)	64% (82/128)	-14pp
overpass	51% (20/39)	42% (10/24)	+9pp
nuke	60% (40/67)	57% (114/199)	+3pp
anubis	67% (36/54)	70% (81/116)	-3pp
inferno	56% (60/108)	56% (67/120)	0pp
vertigo	55% (6/11)	55% (42/77)	0pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

vertigo 55% WR

Sharks bans

overpass 42% WR

mirage 50% WR

TYLOO pick

anubis

49% — TYLOO favored

Decider

inferno

50% TYLOO

Decider

dust2

100% Sharks

Sharks pick

nuke

49% — Sharks favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

Sharks

mirage

58%

42%

TYLOO

ancient

44%

56%

Sharks

overpass

55%

45%

TYLOO

nuke

51%

49%

even

anubis

49%

51%

even

inferno

50%

even

vertigo

50%

even

TYLOO on left · Sharks on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
MVP JamYoung RIFLER	61	33	14	59%	112.8	86.7%	1.66	9.1
Mercury RIFLER	35	35	11	46%	64.3	68.3%	0.98	9.1
Moseyuh RIFLER	32	36	16	56%	69.3	66.7%	0.94	9.1
Jee AWP	31	35	16	32%	64.2	66.7%	0.92	9.3
Zero	33	41	12	45%	67.1	63.3%	0.87	—
Sharks
MVP koala	42	36	8	50%	82.3	68.3%	1.12	—
maxxkor	39	32	16	33%	71.2	70.0%	1.11	—
gafolo	34	35	10	47%	64.8	70.0%	0.98	—
doc	32	42	15	78%	73.8	65.0%	0.89	—
rdnzao	30	44	10	57%	63.6	60.0%	0.76	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO
JamYoung	16	12	5	63%	100.4	84.2%	1.42	9.1
Mercury	11	12	5	45%	77.0	73.7%	1.04	9.1
Zero	10	16	2	40%	73.5	47.4%	0.66	—
Jee	6	12	3	33%	33.3	42.1%	0.43	9.3
Moseyuh	4	13	1	75%	38.5	42.1%	0.32	9.1
Sharks WIN
koala	16	8	3	56%	83.2	84.2%	1.46	—
doc	14	12	8	79%	105.8	84.2%	1.36	—
rdnzao	15	12	5	53%	90.4	79.0%	1.30	—
maxxkor	9	6	8	22%	63.0	73.7%	1.08	—
gafolo	11	9	3	55%	63.9	68.4%	1.03	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
JamYoung	16	9	3	38%	89.4	88.9%	1.52	9.1
Moseyuh	13	8	5	54%	79.0	72.2%	1.26	9.1
Jee	11	7	6	27%	67.4	83.3%	1.24	9.3
Mercury	13	8	1	62%	68.7	72.2%	1.20	9.1
Zero	10	10	9	40%	74.7	83.3%	1.14	—
Sharks
koala	14	12	0	64%	92.3	61.1%	1.12	—
maxxkor	9	12	2	44%	54.5	61.1%	0.77	—
gafolo	7	13	4	57%	52.3	72.2%	0.73	—
doc	6	12	3	83%	49.6	55.6%	0.58	—
rdnzao	5	13	1	60%	36.7	50.0%	0.41	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
JamYoung	29	12	6	69%	141.4	87.0%	1.99	9.1
Moseyuh	15	15	10	53%	87.0	82.6%	1.20	9.1
Jee	14	16	7	36%	87.4	73.9%	1.07	9.3
Zero	13	15	1	54%	55.8	60.9%	0.83	—
Mercury	11	15	5	27%	50.3	60.9%	0.75	9.1
Sharks
maxxkor	21	14	6	33%	91.2	73.9%	1.38	—
gafolo	16	13	3	38%	75.4	69.6%	1.12	—
koala	12	16	5	25%	73.8	60.9%	0.84	—
doc	12	18	4	75%	66.3	56.5%	0.74	—
rdnzao	10	19	4	60%	62.5	52.2%	0.60	—

Teams

Players in this match

JamYoung koala maxxkor Mercury gafolo Moseyuh Jee doc Zero rdnzao