Gaimin Gladiators vs HEROIC

T1 BO3 CS2 2026-06-03

Gaimin Gladiators

0 : 2

HEROIC wins

HEROIC Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	Gaimin Gladiators	HEROIC	Edge
mirage	0% (0/2)	60% (75/124)	-60pp
vertigo	26% (5/19)	58% (28/48)	-32pp
anubis	38% (15/39)	56% (27/48)	-18pp
nuke	44% (25/57)	53% (60/113)	-9pp
dust2	46% (32/69)	53% (39/74)	-7pp
overpass	62% (10/16)	67% (39/58)	-5pp
inferno	53% (38/72)	54% (38/70)	-1pp
ancient	56% (40/72)	55% (54/99)	+1pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

Gaimin Gladiators bans

vertigo 26% WR

anubis 38% WR

HEROIC bans

nuke 53% WR

dust2 53% WR

Gaimin Gladiators pick

overpass

48% — Gaimin Gladiators favored

Decider

mirage

100% HEROIC

Decider

inferno

50% Gaimin Gladiators

HEROIC pick

ancient

50% — HEROIC favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

mirage

100%

HEROIC

vertigo

31%

69%

HEROIC

anubis

40%

60%

HEROIC

nuke

45%

55%

HEROIC

dust2

46%

54%

even

overpass

48%

52%

even

inferno

50%

even

ancient

50%

even

Gaimin Gladiators on left · HEROIC on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gaimin Gladiators
MVP HEN1	26	24	7	35%	73.0	67.6%	1.07	—
Luken	23	25	9	57%	81.6	70.3%	1.04	—
JOTA	22	31	11	55%	86.2	67.6%	0.93	—
NEKIZ ENTRY	20	30	6	55%	74.1	59.5%	0.78	6.0
fer	15	29	7	67%	56.0	56.8%	0.61	—
HEROIC WIN
MVP yxngstxr AWP	34	18	11	41%	98.0	81.1%	1.53	9.5
nilo	36	23	6	56%	114.2	73.0%	1.49	—
susp ENTRY	32	21	10	59%	98.0	81.1%	1.44	9.2
xfl0ud RIFLER	17	21	9	53%	51.0	70.3%	0.86	9.4
Chr1zN ENTRY	18	25	10	67%	61.0	62.2%	0.80	9.0

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gaimin Gladiators
HEN1	16	10	2	38%	77.7	68.4%	1.27	—
Luken	11	13	8	73%	88.4	79.0%	1.10	—
JOTA	13	17	7	46%	96.0	73.7%	1.06	—
NEKiZ	11	16	2	64%	73.5	57.9%	0.78	6.0
fer	4	15	5	50%	37.8	52.6%	0.35	—
HEROIC WIN
susp	20	12	6	55%	116.8	84.2%	1.66	9.2
yxngstxr	17	8	4	41%	89.7	84.2%	1.53	9.5
nilo	18	12	2	44%	111.1	73.7%	1.45	—
xfl0ud	10	11	6	50%	61.5	79.0%	1.01	9.4
Chr1zN	6	12	5	50%	46.4	57.9%	0.60	9.0

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
Gaimin Gladiators
Luken	12	12	1	42%	74.3	61.1%	0.97	—
fer	11	14	2	73%	75.2	61.1%	0.87	—
HEN1	10	14	5	30%	67.9	66.7%	0.86	—
JOTA	9	14	4	67%	75.8	61.1%	0.79	—
NEKiZ	9	14	4	44%	74.8	61.1%	0.79	6.0
HEROIC WIN
yxngstxr	17	10	7	41%	106.7	77.8%	1.53	9.5
nilo	18	11	4	67%	117.4	72.2%	1.53	—
susp	12	9	4	67%	78.1	77.8%	1.21	9.2
Chr1zN	12	13	5	75%	76.4	66.7%	1.01	9.0
xfl0ud	7	10	3	57%	39.9	61.1%	0.69	9.4

Teams

Players in this match

yxngstxr nilo susp HEN1 Luken JOTA xfl0ud Chr1zN NEKIZ fer