TYLOO vs SINNERS — CounterQuant

T1 BO3 CS2 2026-06-03

TYLOO Winner

2 : 0

TYLOO wins

SINNERS

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	TYLOO	SINNERS	Edge
dust2	0% (0/1)	55% (48/87)	-55pp
mirage	70% (57/82)	52% (92/176)	+18pp
overpass	51% (20/39)	64% (53/83)	-13pp
anubis	67% (36/54)	55% (54/98)	+12pp
vertigo	55% (6/11)	45% (13/29)	+10pp
inferno	56% (60/108)	49% (75/153)	+7pp
ancient	50% (37/74)	56% (98/175)	-6pp
nuke	60% (40/67)	55% (102/184)	+5pp

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

TYLOO bans

ancient 50% WR

overpass 51% WR

SINNERS bans

vertigo 45% WR

inferno 49% WR

TYLOO pick

mirage

57% — TYLOO favored

Decider

anubis

55% TYLOO

Decider

dust2

100% SINNERS

SINNERS pick

nuke

48% — SINNERS favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

dust2

100%

SINNERS

mirage

57%

43%

TYLOO

overpass

44%

56%

SINNERS

anubis

55%

45%

TYLOO

vertigo

55%

45%

TYLOO

inferno

53%

47%

even

ancient

47%

53%

even

nuke

52%

48%

even

TYLOO on left · SINNERS on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
MVP Zero	45	35	17	51%	91.2	67.9%	1.26	—
JamYoung RIFLER	34	37	15	53%	76.0	66.0%	1.00	9.1
Mercury RIFLER	30	37	16	60%	82.7	66.0%	0.96	9.1
Jee AWP	30	32	10	37%	72.8	64.2%	0.95	9.3
Moseyuh RIFLER	32	38	10	53%	71.4	60.4%	0.89	9.1
SINNERS
MVP MoDo	41	29	11	17%	95.3	73.6%	1.30	—
stressarN RIFLER	37	33	10	43%	72.8	71.7%	1.11	9.2
beastik ENTRY	35	35	16	71%	81.3	71.7%	1.09	8.6
kisserek ENTRY	35	37	18	57%	83.4	71.7%	1.08	8.8
SHOCK	25	34	11	52%	60.4	60.4%	0.78	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
Jee	17	12	6	29%	99.3	69.6%	1.27	9.3
Moseyuh	15	13	2	53%	69.1	69.6%	1.06	9.1
Mercury	15	13	2	53%	79.0	65.2%	1.06	9.1
Zero	15	17	5	67%	78.4	60.9%	0.95	—
JamYoung	11	14	6	64%	57.8	65.2%	0.84	9.1
SINNERS
MoDo	15	12	4	20%	85.7	69.6%	1.15	—
SHOCK	13	12	3	54%	66.9	65.2%	0.98	—
stressarN	14	13	2	50%	57.4	65.2%	0.96	9.2
beastik	11	15	10	64%	60.6	65.2%	0.84	8.6
kisserek	11	17	6	36%	75.9	60.9%	0.79	8.8

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
TYLOO WIN
Zero	30	18	12	43%	101.0	73.3%	1.51	—
JamYoung	23	23	9	48%	89.9	66.7%	1.12	9.1
Mercury	15	24	14	67%	85.5	66.7%	0.87	9.1
Moseyuh	17	25	8	53%	73.1	53.3%	0.76	9.1
Jee	13	20	4	46%	52.5	60.0%	0.70	9.3
SINNERS
MoDo	26	17	7	15%	102.6	76.7%	1.42	—
kisserek	24	20	12	67%	89.1	80.0%	1.31	8.8
beastik	24	20	6	75%	97.1	76.7%	1.29	8.6
stressarN	23	20	8	39%	84.5	76.7%	1.23	9.2
SHOCK	12	22	8	50%	55.4	56.7%	0.63	—

Teams

Players in this match

MoDo Zero stressarN beastik kisserek JamYoung Mercury Jee Moseyuh SHOCK