T1 BO1 CS2 2026-06-02
BIG BIG Winner
1 : 0
BIG wins
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map BIG vs Gaimin Gladiators Edge
mirage
51% (62/122)
0% (0/2) +51pp
vertigo
58% (42/73)
26% (5/19) +32pp
anubis
47% (32/68)
38% (15/39) +9pp
dust2
54% (46/85)
46% (32/69) +8pp
inferno
51% (47/93)
53% (38/72) -2pp
ancient
58% (82/141)
56% (40/72) +2pp
nuke
45% (48/106)
44% (25/57) +1pp
overpass
62% (47/76)
62% (10/16) 0pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
BIG bans
nuke 45% WR
anubis 47% WR
Gaimin Gladiators bans
vertigo 26% WR
dust2 46% WR
BIG pick
overpass
50% — BIG favored
Decider
mirage
100% BIG
Decider
inferno
51% Gaimin Gladiators
Gaimin Gladiators pick
ancient
49% — Gaimin Gladiators favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
mirage
100%
0%
BIG
vertigo
69%
31%
BIG
anubis
55%
45%
BIG
dust2
54%
46%
even
inferno
49%
51%
even
ancient
51%
49%
even
nuke
51%
49%
even
overpass
50%
50%
even
BIG on left · Gaimin Gladiators on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
Player K D A Rating
BIG WIN
MVP gr1ks
17 4 2 2.15
blameF
19 5 2 2.08
JDC
15 6 4 1.87
tabseN
8 6 3 1.47
faveN
7 6 4 1.38
MVP fer
9 13 1 0.77
5 11 0 0.39
5 12 1 0.37
NEKIZ
5 14 2 0.16
1 14 0 0.00
Player K D A Rating
BIG WIN
gr1ks
17 4 2 2.15
blameF
19 5 2 2.08
JDC
15 6 4 1.87
tabseN
8 6 3 1.47
faveN
7 6 4 1.38
fer
9 13 1 0.77
Luken
5 11 0 0.39
HEN1
5 12 1 0.37
NEKiZ
5 14 2 0.16
JOTA
1 14 0 0.00