T1 BO1 CS2 2026-06-02
BetBoom BetBoom Winner
1 : 0
BetBoom wins
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map BetBoom vs Liquid Edge
dust2
65% (40/62)
47% (28/60) +18pp
nuke
60% (79/132)
46% (38/82) +14pp
overpass
61% (37/61)
53% (19/36) +8pp
vertigo
31% (8/26)
25% (4/16) +6pp
inferno
50% (2/4)
55% (56/102) -5pp
mirage
60% (84/139)
56% (49/87) +4pp
ancient
60% (72/121)
62% (53/86) -2pp
anubis
59% (47/80)
61% (39/64) -2pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
BetBoom bans
vertigo 31% WR
inferno 50% WR
Liquid bans
nuke 46% WR
dust2 47% WR
BetBoom pick
overpass
54% — BetBoom favored
Decider
anubis
51% Liquid
Decider
mirage
52% BetBoom
Liquid pick
ancient
51% — Liquid favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
58%
42%
BetBoom
nuke
57%
43%
BetBoom
overpass
54%
46%
even
vertigo
55%
45%
BetBoom
inferno
48%
52%
even
mirage
52%
48%
even
ancient
49%
51%
even
anubis
49%
51%
even
BetBoom on left · Liquid on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
Player K D A Rating
BetBoom WIN
MVP NAF
14 13 7 1.25
16 14 2 1.22
13 15 5 1.00
14 15 1 0.96
siuhy
9 17 4 0.45
MVP Boombl4
16 13 13 1.32
d1Ledez
16 12 4 1.28
zorte
17 12 1 1.26
16 14 5 1.12
Magnojez
10 16 8 0.72
Player K D A Rating
BetBoom WIN
NAF
14 13 7 1.25
malbsMd
16 14 2 1.22
EliGE
13 15 5 1.00
ultimate
14 15 1 0.96
siuhy
9 17 4 0.45
Boombl4
16 13 13 1.32
d1Ledez
16 12 4 1.28
zorte
17 12 1 1.26
FL4MUS
16 14 5 1.12
Magnojez
10 16 8 0.72