T1
BO1
CS2
2026-06-02
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | GamerLegion | vs | FlyQuest | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
66% (42/64) |
|
33% (2/6) | +33pp |
anubis
|
48% (20/42) |
|
72% (29/40) | -24pp |
dust2
|
45% (13/29) |
|
61% (25/41) | -16pp |
nuke
|
52% (42/81) |
|
41% (13/32) | +11pp |
vertigo
|
51% (20/39) |
|
62% (5/8) | -11pp |
ancient
|
53% (46/86) |
|
60% (25/42) | -7pp |
mirage
|
48% (47/97) |
|
52% (16/31) | -4pp |
inferno
|
60% (52/86) |
|
59% (30/51) | +1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
GamerLegion bans
dust2
45% WR
anubis
48% WR
FlyQuest bans
overpass
33% WR
nuke
41% WR
GamerLegion pick
inferno
50% — GamerLegion favored
Decider
mirage
52% FlyQuest
Decider
ancient
53% FlyQuest
FlyQuest pick
vertigo
55% — FlyQuest favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
GamerLegion
anubis
FlyQuest
dust2
FlyQuest
nuke
GamerLegion
vertigo
FlyQuest
ancient
even
mirage
even
inferno
even
GamerLegion on left ·
FlyQuest on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
| Player | K | D | A | Rating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
REZ
|
22 | 14 | 7 | 1.48 | ||||
|
Tauson
|
18 | 12 | 5 | 1.38 | ||||
|
hypex
|
11 | 13 | 0 | 0.79 | ||||
|
PR
|
10 | 16 | 4 | 0.67 | ||||
|
Snax
|
10 | 16 | 6 | 0.61 | ||||
|
nettik
|
20 | 13 | 9 | 1.52 | ||||
|
jks
|
12 | 11 | 5 | 1.11 | ||||
|
Vexite
|
15 | 16 | 2 | 0.94 | ||||
|
INS
|
13 | 18 | 5 | 0.75 | ||||
|
story
|
8 | 12 | 3 | 0.66 | ||||