CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | MIBR | vs | TYLOO | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
38% (3/8) |
|
0% (0/1) | +38pp |
|
|
47% (43/91) |
|
70% (57/82) | -23pp |
|
|
65% (72/111) |
|
50% (37/74) | +15pp |
|
|
66% (63/96) |
|
56% (60/108) | +10pp |
|
|
60% (49/82) |
|
55% (6/11) | +5pp |
|
|
63% (69/109) |
|
67% (36/54) | -4pp |
|
|
47% (14/30) |
|
51% (20/39) | -4pp |
|
|
59% (72/122) |
|
60% (40/67) | -1pp |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR bans
TYLOO bans
MIBR pick
54% — MIBR favored
Decider
50% MIBR
Decider
100% MIBR
TYLOO pick
52% — TYLOO favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
MIBR
TYLOO
MIBR
even
even
even
even
even
MIBR on left ·
TYLOO on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side