T1 BO1 CS2 2026-06-02
MIBR MIBR Winner
1 : 0
MIBR wins
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map MIBR vs TYLOO Edge
dust2
38% (3/8)
0% (0/1) +38pp
mirage
47% (43/91)
70% (57/82) -23pp
ancient
65% (72/111)
50% (37/74) +15pp
inferno
66% (63/96)
56% (60/108) +10pp
vertigo
60% (49/82)
55% (6/11) +5pp
anubis
63% (69/109)
67% (36/54) -4pp
overpass
47% (14/30)
51% (20/39) -4pp
nuke
59% (72/122)
60% (40/67) -1pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
MIBR bans
mirage 47% WR
overpass 47% WR
TYLOO bans
ancient 50% WR
vertigo 55% WR
MIBR pick
inferno
54% — MIBR favored
Decider
nuke
50% MIBR
Decider
dust2
100% MIBR
TYLOO pick
anubis
52% — TYLOO favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
dust2
100%
0%
MIBR
mirage
40%
60%
TYLOO
ancient
57%
43%
MIBR
inferno
54%
46%
even
vertigo
52%
48%
even
anubis
48%
52%
even
overpass
48%
52%
even
nuke
50%
50%
even
MIBR on left · TYLOO on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
Player K D A Rating
MIBR WIN
MVP LNZ
31 18 6 1.62
kl1m
22 18 5 1.20
insani
21 21 3 1.00
brnz4n
16 20 5 0.92
venomzera
21 22 3 0.85
MVP Jee
21 20 6 1.13
Moseyuh
20 26 5 0.97
JamYoung
20 21 1 0.87
20 22 4 0.87
Mercury
15 20 7 0.75
Player K D A Rating
MIBR WIN
LNZ
31 18 6 1.62
kl1m
22 18 5 1.20
insani
21 21 3 1.00
brnz4n
16 20 5 0.92
venomzera
21 22 3 0.85
Jee
21 20 6 1.13
Moseyuh
20 26 5 0.97
JamYoung
20 21 1 0.87
Zero
20 22 4 0.87
Mercury
15 20 7 0.75