T2
BO3
CS2
2026-06-12
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | aAa | vs | Young Ninjas | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
0% (0/2) |
|
72% (18/25) | -72pp |
nuke
|
31% (4/13) |
|
52% (16/31) | -21pp |
dust2
|
38% (5/13) |
|
58% (29/50) | -20pp |
anubis
|
67% (2/3) |
|
47% (14/30) | +20pp |
inferno
|
14% (1/7) |
|
33% (4/12) | -19pp |
ancient
|
40% (4/10) |
|
49% (30/61) | -9pp |
mirage
|
— | · | 54% (27/50) | |
vertigo
|
— | · | 71% (25/35) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
aAa bans
inferno
14% WR
nuke
31% WR
Young Ninjas bans
anubis
47% WR
ancient
49% WR
aAa pick
dust2
40% — aAa favored
Decider
vertigo
Decider
mirage
Young Ninjas pick
overpass
100% — Young Ninjas favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
Young Ninjas
nuke
Young Ninjas
dust2
Young Ninjas
anubis
aAa
inferno
Young Ninjas
ancient
Young Ninjas
aAa on left ·
Young Ninjas on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.