T2 BO3 CS2 2026-06-03
2 : 0
Young Ninjas wins
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map Young Ninjas vs Entropy Edge
nuke
52% (16/31)
0% (0/2) +52pp
overpass
72% (18/25)
20% (1/5) +52pp
inferno
33% (4/12)
43% (3/7) -10pp
dust2
58% (29/50)
50% (1/2) +8pp
mirage
54% (27/50)
50% (5/10) +4pp
anubis
47% (14/30)
50% (4/8) -3pp
ancient
49% (30/61)
50% (4/8) -1pp
vertigo
71% (25/35) ·
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Young Ninjas bans
inferno 33% WR
anubis 47% WR
Entropy bans
overpass 20% WR
mirage 50% WR
Young Ninjas pick
ancient
49% — Young Ninjas favored
Decider
nuke
100% Young Ninjas
Decider
vertigo
Entropy pick
dust2
46% — Entropy favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
100%
0%
Young Ninjas
overpass
78%
22%
Young Ninjas
inferno
43%
57%
Entropy
dust2
54%
46%
even
mirage
52%
48%
even
anubis
48%
52%
even
ancient
49%
51%
even
Young Ninjas on left · Entropy on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
Player K D A Rating
MVP n0te
53 34 12 1.57
rud
41 30 4 1.41
36 26 6 1.41
41 31 4 1.35
35 31 23 1.31
MVP GeGo
35 33 7 1.11
27
34 42 4 0.93
32 45 7 0.85
28 44 3 0.60
20 39 7 0.52
Player K D A Rating
n0te
35 14 7 2.10
tein
16 9 4 1.72
joeski
22 13 2 1.66
rud
20 12 0 1.65
just better
18 15 11 1.38
GeGo
17 17 2 0.97
Tevsii
15 22 1 0.70
flaw
13 25 3 0.57
27
8 21 3 0.39
mikanix
5 21 2 0.00
Player K D A Rating
rud
21 18 4 1.24
just better
17 16 12 1.23
tein
20 17 2 1.21
joeski
19 18 2 1.11
n0te
18 20 5 1.08
27
26 21 1 1.36
GeGo
18 16 5 1.25
flaw
19 20 4 1.11
mikanix
15 18 5 0.96
Tevsii
13 22 2 0.51