T1 BO1 CS2 2026-06-02
M80 M80 Winner
1 : 0
M80 wins
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map M80 vs Lynn Vision Edge
vertigo
69% (29/42)
46% (6/13) +23pp
ancient
72% (87/120)
58% (48/83) +14pp
dust2
56% (35/63)
70% (61/87) -14pp
overpass
69% (29/42)
62% (20/32) +7pp
inferno
60% (50/83)
54% (41/76) +6pp
anubis
59% (38/64)
56% (39/70) +3pp
nuke
47% (8/17)
49% (38/78) -2pp
mirage
71% (64/90) ·
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
M80 bans
nuke 47% WR
dust2 56% WR
Lynn Vision bans
vertigo 46% WR
inferno 54% WR
M80 pick
ancient
55% — M80 favored
Decider
mirage
Decider
anubis
51% M80
Lynn Vision pick
overpass
47% — Lynn Vision favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
vertigo
60%
40%
M80
ancient
55%
45%
M80
dust2
44%
56%
Lynn Vision
overpass
53%
47%
even
inferno
53%
47%
even
anubis
51%
49%
even
nuke
49%
51%
even
M80 on left · Lynn Vision on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
Player K D A Rating
M80 WIN
MVP Swisher
20 15 5 1.45
s1n
14 11 7 1.15
slaxz-
14 11 2 1.09
Lake
12 11 2 0.96
JBa
11 12 5 0.96
MVP C4LLM3SU3
14 13 2 1.12
13 13 6 1.02
14 14 3 1.01
10 16 2 0.72
8 14 4 0.67
Player K D A Rating
M80 WIN
Swisher
20 15 5 1.45
s1n
14 11 7 1.15
slaxz-
14 11 2 1.09
Lake
12 11 2 0.96
JBa
11 12 5 0.96
C4LLM3SU3
14 13 2 1.12
Starry
13 13 6 1.02
westmelon
14 14 3 1.01
z4KR
10 16 2 0.72
EmiliaQAQ
8 14 4 0.67