T1 BO1 CS2 2026-06-02
0 : 1
Sharks wins
Sharks Sharks Winner
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map HEROIC vs Sharks Edge
overpass
67% (39/58)
42% (10/24) +25pp
dust2
53% (39/74)
75% (6/8) -22pp
anubis
56% (27/48)
70% (81/116) -14pp
mirage
60% (75/124)
50% (66/133) +10pp
ancient
55% (54/99)
64% (82/128) -9pp
nuke
53% (60/113)
57% (114/199) -4pp
vertigo
58% (28/48)
55% (42/77) +3pp
inferno
54% (38/70)
56% (67/120) -2pp
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
HEROIC bans
dust2 53% WR
nuke 53% WR
Sharks bans
overpass 42% WR
mirage 50% WR
HEROIC pick
vertigo
51% — HEROIC favored
Decider
inferno
51% Sharks
Decider
ancient
54% Sharks
Sharks pick
anubis
56% — Sharks favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
61%
39%
HEROIC
dust2
41%
59%
Sharks
anubis
44%
56%
Sharks
mirage
55%
45%
HEROIC
ancient
46%
54%
even
nuke
48%
52%
even
vertigo
51%
49%
even
inferno
49%
51%
even
HEROIC on left · Sharks on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side
Player K D A Rating
MVP xfl0ud
18 15 6 1.23
yxngstxr
14 17 2 0.93
12 18 8 0.89
susp
14 17 2 0.81
Chr1zN
12 19 4 0.67
Sharks WIN
MVP doc
23 16 3 1.44
19 13 3 1.32
19 12 4 1.32
19 15 6 1.28
7 15 5 0.65
Player K D A Rating
xfl0ud
18 15 6 1.23
yxngstxr
14 17 2 0.93
nilo
12 18 8 0.89
susp
14 17 2 0.81
Chr1zN
12 19 4 0.67
Sharks WIN
doc
23 16 3 1.44
maxxkor
19 13 3 1.32
koala
19 12 4 1.32
rdnzao
19 15 6 1.28
gafolo
7 15 5 0.65