T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-23
CQ GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
MIRAGE model →
Map BAKS vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects Edge
ancient
0% (0/2)
73% (8/11) -73pp
nuke
75% (3/4)
20% (1/5) +55pp
inferno
40% (2/5)
71% (5/7) -31pp
dust2
43% (3/7)
56% (9/16) -13pp
mirage
50% (2/4)
50% (3/6) 0pp
anubis
· 40% (2/5)
overpass
0% (0/2)
0% (0/1) 0pp
vertigo
·
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
MIRAGE model →
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
BAKS bans
inferno 40% WR
dust2 43% WR
CYBERSHOKE Prospects bans
nuke 20% WR
mirage 50% WR
BAKS pick
overpass
Decider
anubis
Decider
vertigo
CYBERSHOKE Prospects pick
ancient
100% — CYBERSHOKE Prospects favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
0%
100%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
nuke
79%
21%
BAKS
inferno
36%
64%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
dust2
43%
57%
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
mirage
50%
50%
even
BAKS on left · CYBERSHOKE Prospects on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Unverified Match — No Demo Data

Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.