CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Wildcard | vs | FOKUS | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
57% (52/92) |
|
100% (17/17) | -43pp |
overpass
|
59% (32/54) |
|
83% (5/6) | -24pp |
mirage
|
62% (26/42) |
|
53% (8/15) | +9pp |
nuke
|
63% (51/81) |
|
55% (6/11) | +8pp |
dust2
|
52% (35/67) |
|
44% (8/18) | +8pp |
inferno
|
57% (48/84) |
|
54% (7/13) | +3pp |
anubis
|
65% (33/51) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
64% (21/33) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Wildcard bans
dust2
52% WR
ancient
57% WR
FOKUS bans
mirage
53% WR
inferno
54% WR
Wildcard pick
nuke
53% — Wildcard favored
Decider
anubis
Decider
vertigo
FOKUS pick
overpass
58% — FOKUS favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
FOKUS
overpass
FOKUS
mirage
even
nuke
even
dust2
even
inferno
even
Wildcard on left ·
FOKUS on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.