T3
BO3
CS2
2026-05-23
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Inner Circle | vs | Sharks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
45% (19/42) |
|
64% (82/128) | -19pp |
dust2
|
56% (18/32) |
|
75% (6/8) | -19pp |
anubis
|
56% (5/9) |
|
70% (81/116) | -14pp |
overpass
|
29% (4/14) |
|
42% (10/24) | -13pp |
nuke
|
45% (15/33) |
|
57% (114/199) | -12pp |
mirage
|
57% (26/46) |
|
50% (66/133) | +7pp |
inferno
|
— | · | 56% (67/120) | |
vertigo
|
— | · | 55% (42/77) |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Inner Circle bans
overpass
29% WR
ancient
45% WR
Sharks bans
mirage
50% WR
nuke
57% WR
Inner Circle pick
anubis
44% — Inner Circle favored
Decider
inferno
Decider
vertigo
Sharks pick
dust2
57% — Sharks favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
Sharks
dust2
Sharks
anubis
Sharks
overpass
Sharks
nuke
Sharks
mirage
even
Inner Circle on left ·
Sharks on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.