CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | Sharks | vs | FOKUS | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
overpass
|
42% (10/24) |
|
83% (5/6) | -41pp |
ancient
|
64% (82/128) |
|
100% (17/17) | -36pp |
dust2
|
75% (6/8) |
|
44% (8/18) | +31pp |
mirage
|
50% (66/133) |
|
53% (8/15) | -3pp |
nuke
|
57% (114/199) |
|
55% (6/11) | +2pp |
inferno
|
56% (67/120) |
|
54% (7/13) | +2pp |
anubis
|
70% (81/116) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
55% (42/77) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
Sharks bans
overpass
42% WR
mirage
50% WR
FOKUS bans
dust2
44% WR
inferno
54% WR
Sharks pick
ancient
39% — Sharks favored
Decider
anubis
Decider
vertigo
FOKUS pick
nuke
49% — FOKUS favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
overpass
FOKUS
ancient
FOKUS
dust2
Sharks
mirage
even
nuke
even
inferno
even
Sharks on left ·
FOKUS on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.