CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | HAVU | vs | Acend | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
anubis
|
39% (12/31) |
|
86% (6/7) | -47pp |
nuke
|
51% (50/99) |
|
17% (1/6) | +34pp |
inferno
|
37% (14/38) |
|
71% (15/21) | -34pp |
mirage
|
28% (16/58) |
|
54% (19/35) | -26pp |
ancient
|
38% (21/56) |
|
52% (16/31) | -14pp |
dust2
|
40% (17/43) |
|
47% (16/34) | -7pp |
overpass
|
36% (12/33) |
|
36% (10/28) | 0pp |
vertigo
|
47% (7/15) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
HAVU bans
mirage
28% WR
overpass
36% WR
Acend bans
nuke
17% WR
dust2
47% WR
HAVU pick
anubis
31% — HAVU favored
Decider
ancient
58% Acend
Decider
vertigo
Acend pick
inferno
66% — Acend favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
anubis
Acend
nuke
HAVU
inferno
Acend
mirage
Acend
ancient
Acend
dust2
even
overpass
even
HAVU on left ·
Acend on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side