ALGO vs EAC — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-21

ALGO Winner

2 : 0

ALGO wins

EAC

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	ALGO	vs	EAC	Edge
inferno	48% (10/21)		0% (0/1)	+48pp
mirage	41% (11/27)		0% (0/3)	+41pp
ancient	44% (12/27)		20% (1/5)	+24pp
nuke	42% (15/36)		20% (1/5)	+22pp
overpass	47% (8/17)		50% (3/6)	-3pp
dust2	15% (2/13)	·	—
anubis	23% (3/13)	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

ALGO bans

mirage 41% WR

nuke 42% WR

EAC bans

ancient 20% WR

overpass 50% WR

ALGO pick

dust2

Decider

anubis

Decider

vertigo

EAC pick

inferno

0% — EAC favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

inferno

100%

ALGO

mirage

100%

ALGO

ancient

69%

31%

ALGO

nuke

68%

32%

ALGO

overpass

48%

52%

even

ALGO on left · EAC on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ALGO WIN
MVP nukkye RIFLER	36	25	13	39%	101.8	71.7%	1.33	3.8
aNdu RIFLER	40	30	12	43%	99.0	67.4%	1.30	3.4
adex AWP	33	26	5	27%	74.5	73.9%	1.17	4.5
szejn RIFLER	28	25	10	57%	74.6	71.7%	1.08	3.4
Bambosh RIFLER	18	29	10	56%	50.2	56.5%	0.66	2.8
EAC
MVP sSen RIFLER	35	26	10	71%	96.9	67.4%	1.24	5.9
bekker AWP	30	30	7	13%	66.4	73.9%	1.05	5.9
n1Xen RIFLER	26	31	8	73%	75.5	69.6%	0.96	6.0
Maze RIFLER	23	33	9	61%	67.6	67.4%	0.84	5.5
anber ENTRY	21	36	10	43%	54.2	60.9%	0.68	4.2
▸ Observers / Coaches (2)
VIZE	— observer —
Observer	— observer —

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ALGO WIN
aNdu	24	14	4	33%	124.8	72.7%	1.61	3.4
szejn	16	11	4	63%	86.4	77.3%	1.28	3.4
nukkye	14	12	6	50%	92.6	72.7%	1.18	3.8
adeX	14	13	3	21%	71.1	54.6%	0.94	4.5
Bambosh	4	15	3	75%	35.3	45.5%	0.31	2.8
EAC
n1Xen	13	14	5	62%	83.4	81.8%	1.12	6.0
bekker	14	13	4	14%	78.9	72.7%	1.10	5.9
Maze	14	15	2	50%	81.7	63.6%	0.98	5.5
sSen	11	14	4	82%	81.6	63.6%	0.90	5.9
anber	13	16	4	38%	62.9	63.6%	0.87	4.2
▸ Observers (1)
Observer	— observer —

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
ALGO WIN
nukkye	22	13	7	32%	110.2	70.8%	1.46	3.8
adeX	19	13	2	32%	77.6	91.7%	1.38	4.5
aNdu	16	16	8	56%	75.4	62.5%	1.01	3.4
Bambosh	14	14	7	50%	63.9	66.7%	0.98	2.8
szejn	12	14	6	50%	63.7	66.7%	0.90	3.4
EAC
sSen	24	12	6	67%	111.0	70.8%	1.56	5.9
bekker	16	17	3	13%	55.0	75.0%	1.00	5.9
n1Xen	13	17	3	85%	68.2	58.3%	0.81	6.0
Maze	9	18	7	78%	54.7	70.8%	0.71	5.5
anber	8	20	6	50%	46.3	58.3%	0.50	4.2
▸ Observers (1)
VIZE	— observer —

Teams

Players in this match

nukkye aNdu sSen adex szejn bekker n1Xen Maze anber Bambosh