EAC vs Atreides — CounterQuant

T3 BO3 CS2 2026-05-24

EAC

1 : 2

Atreides wins

Atreides Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	EAC	vs	Atreides	Edge
mirage	0% (0/3)		75% (15/20)	-75pp
inferno	0% (0/1)		60% (6/10)	-60pp
ancient	20% (1/5)		75% (9/12)	-55pp
nuke	20% (1/5)		54% (7/13)	-34pp
overpass	50% (3/6)		42% (5/12)	+8pp
dust2	—	·	50% (5/10)
anubis	—	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

EAC bans

mirage 0% WR

ancient 20% WR

Atreides bans

overpass 42% WR

nuke 54% WR

EAC pick

dust2

Decider

anubis

Decider

vertigo

Atreides pick

inferno

100% — Atreides favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

mirage

100%

Atreides

inferno

100%

Atreides

ancient

21%

79%

Atreides

nuke

27%

73%

Atreides

overpass

54%

46%

even

EAC on left · Atreides on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
EAC
MVP bekker AWP	43	31	13	33%	77.4	76.3%	1.24	5.9
n1Xen RIFLER	50	37	6	46%	81.2	66.1%	1.21	6.0
anber ENTRY	41	47	18	71%	88.1	67.8%	1.05	4.2
sSen RIFLER	32	40	12	66%	59.6	66.1%	0.86	5.9
Maze RIFLER	31	43	13	58%	69.8	55.9%	0.78	5.5
Atreides WIN
MVP CHANKY	48	39	11	44%	85.6	71.2%	1.23	—
dan1 ENTRY	39	35	16	51%	74.2	71.2%	1.10	4.2
Dementor RIFLER	40	41	15	43%	70.6	67.8%	1.02	5.8
DEPRESHN AWP	35	40	17	40%	68.1	64.4%	0.93	6.8
smekk RIFLER	35	41	13	66%	68.3	64.4%	0.91	5.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
EAC
n1Xen	16	13	1	31%	91.2	55.6%	1.15	6.0
sSen	11	13	0	64%	63.3	66.7%	0.89	5.9
Maze	11	15	4	73%	73.1	61.1%	0.85	5.5
anber	8	15	4	75%	68.4	66.7%	0.73	4.2
bekker	7	11	4	29%	40.9	66.7%	0.71	5.9
Atreides WIN
CHANKY	20	12	2	50%	114.1	72.2%	1.57	—
dan1	17	8	2	59%	95.6	77.8%	1.53	4.2
DEPRESHN	13	10	9	38%	73.3	72.2%	1.20	6.8
DEMENTOR	10	12	3	60%	64.6	66.7%	0.90	5.8
smekk	7	11	5	57%	46.8	72.2%	0.78	5.2

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
EAC
anber	20	17	8	65%	107.1	68.2%	1.31	4.2
bekker	18	14	3	22%	83.7	72.7%	1.24	5.9
n1Xen	15	14	3	60%	64.1	72.7%	1.06	6.0
Maze	10	17	6	50%	73.5	50.0%	0.67	5.5
sSen	6	16	6	50%	35.0	54.6%	0.45	5.9
Atreides WIN
DEMENTOR	20	14	6	30%	83.5	86.4%	1.43	5.8
smekk	18	15	7	61%	95.1	68.2%	1.24	5.2
CHANKY	15	12	5	40%	70.6	77.3%	1.17	—
dan1	16	13	8	38%	81.6	68.2%	1.17	4.2
DEPRESHN	9	15	5	44%	53.5	68.2%	0.74	6.8

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
EAC WIN
bekker	18	6	6	44%	104.7	89.5%	1.73	5.9
n1Xen	19	10	2	47%	91.7	68.4%	1.45	6.0
sSen	15	11	6	73%	84.6	79.0%	1.31	5.9
anber	13	15	6	77%	84.8	68.4%	1.04	4.2
Maze	10	11	3	50%	62.5	57.9%	0.85	5.5
Atreides
CHANKY	13	15	4	38%	76.0	63.2%	0.96	—
DEPRESHN	13	15	3	38%	80.1	52.6%	0.89	6.8
DEMENTOR	10	15	6	50%	61.3	47.4%	0.67	5.8
smekk	10	15	1	80%	57.6	52.6%	0.67	5.2
dan1	6	14	6	67%	45.4	68.4%	0.62	4.2

Teams

Players in this match

bekker CHANKY n1Xen dan1 anber Dementor DEPRESHN smekk sSen Maze