T3
BO3
CS2
2026-05-24
CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | 100 Thieves | vs | STATE | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ancient
|
68% (15/22) |
|
39% (7/18) | +29pp |
inferno
|
72% (18/25) |
|
44% (8/18) | +28pp |
mirage
|
50% (7/14) |
|
29% (5/17) | +21pp |
anubis
|
40% (2/5) |
|
20% (1/5) | +20pp |
nuke
|
62% (15/24) |
|
70% (14/20) | -8pp |
overpass
|
67% (2/3) |
|
61% (11/18) | +6pp |
dust2
|
73% (19/26) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
50% (5/10) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
100 Thieves bans
anubis
40% WR
nuke
62% WR
STATE bans
mirage
29% WR
ancient
39% WR
100 Thieves pick
inferno
62% — 100 Thieves favored
Decider
dust2
Decider
vertigo
STATE pick
overpass
48% — STATE favored
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
ancient
100 Thieves
inferno
100 Thieves
mirage
100 Thieves
anubis
100 Thieves
nuke
even
overpass
even
100 Thieves on left ·
STATE on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Unverified Match — No Demo Data
Player stats are only shown for matches validated from V4 parsed demo data. No demo is available for this match.