1win vs Lavked — CounterQuant

T2 BO3 CS2 2026-06-03

1win Winner

2 : 1

1win wins

Lavked

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	1win	vs	Lavked	Edge
ancient	47% (50/106)		92% (11/12)	-45pp
inferno	69% (47/68)		25% (2/8)	+44pp
overpass	53% (29/55)		33% (2/6)	+20pp
anubis	57% (24/42)		50% (5/10)	+7pp
dust2	64% (68/106)		58% (11/19)	+6pp
nuke	59% (19/32)		64% (18/28)	-5pp
mirage	60% (60/100)		61% (22/36)	-1pp
vertigo	57% (20/35)	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

1win bans

ancient 47% WR

overpass 53% WR

Lavked bans

inferno 25% WR

anubis 50% WR

1win pick

dust2

52% — 1win favored

Decider

mirage

50% 1win

Decider

vertigo

Lavked pick

nuke

52% — Lavked favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

ancient

34%

66%

Lavked

inferno

73%

27%

1win

overpass

62%

38%

1win

anubis

53%

47%

even

dust2

52%

48%

even

nuke

48%

52%

even

mirage

50%

even

1win on left · Lavked on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
MVP lattykk AWP	56	32	16	43%	105.7	69.5%	1.47	8.9
cronuss ENTRY	63	53	19	62%	113.8	74.6%	1.42	8.1
oz1k	37	44	22	73%	76.8	68.4%	1.00	—
Qikert RIFLER	39	46	12	54%	72.7	70.0%	0.98	8.2
reyoz	40	47	13	48%	72.2	63.3%	0.94	—
Lavked
MVP xm1nd	48	37	12	40%	83.4	65.0%	1.19	—
k4nfuz RIFLER	49	42	10	65%	87.1	63.3%	1.15	7.3
SoLb	44	50	20	57%	87.2	69.5%	1.08	—
1NVISIBLEE	47	52	14	70%	91.0	62.9%	1.04	—
L1nkero	31	51	13	61%	66.2	54.1%	0.68	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
lattykk	19	11	3	21%	106.9	65.0%	1.42	8.9
cronuss	23	19	5	65%	101.0	78.3%	1.40	8.1
Qikert	17	16	5	65%	94.0	81.8%	1.26	8.2
reyoz	18	16	3	33%	73.2	72.7%	1.16	—
oz1k	7	17	11	71%	65.7	65.0%	0.65	—
Lavked
1NVISIBLEE	21	18	3	71%	99.6	77.3%	1.35	—
SoLb	15	18	11	73%	98.4	80.0%	1.18	—
k4nfuz	15	14	5	60%	86.1	57.1%	1.04	7.3
xm1nd	13	12	2	23%	71.7	57.9%	0.98	—
MVP L1nkero	11	18	4	82%	72.7	52.4%	0.69	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win WIN
cronuss	28	16	4	64%	151.8	85.0%	1.97	8.1
lattykk	13	9	8	62%	86.1	66.7%	1.23	8.9
oz1k	16	14	5	75%	92.4	61.1%	1.19	—
reyoz	13	12	4	77%	80.4	55.6%	1.02	—
Qikert	12	14	5	42%	68.5	72.2%	1.00	8.2
Lavked
1NVISIBLEE	17	16	5	59%	109.8	52.6%	1.15	—
xm1nd	15	15	5	40%	79.6	57.1%	0.99	—
SoLb	16	17	3	38%	81.8	57.1%	0.98	—
k4nfuz	10	17	2	70%	58.4	50.0%	0.60	7.3
MVP L1nkero	7	17	3	43%	44.7	38.1%	0.35	—

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
1win
lattykk	24	12	5	50%	121.3	76.2%	1.71	8.9
oz1k	14	13	6	71%	73.8	79.0%	1.18	—
cronuss	12	18	10	50%	90.5	60.0%	0.88	8.1
Qikert	10	16	2	50%	53.1	55.0%	0.65	8.2
reyoz	9	19	6	33%	63.7	60.0%	0.62	—
Lavked WIN
k4nfuz	24	11	3	67%	118.3	84.2%	1.85	7.3
xm1nd	20	10	5	50%	98.5	80.0%	1.58	—
SoLb	13	15	6	62%	81.1	72.2%	1.06	—
MVP L1nkero	13	16	6	54%	82.8	73.7%	1.04	—
1NVISIBLEE	9	18	6	89%	65.0	57.1%	0.63	—

Teams

Players in this match

lattykk cronuss xm1nd k4nfuz SoLb 1NVISIBLEE oz1k Qikert reyoz L1nkero