CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs ex-Zero Tenacity

T2 BO3 CS2 2026-05-24

CYBERSHOKE Prospects

1 : 2

ex-Zero Tenacity wins

ex-Zero Tenacity Winner

CQ GESUS

Models →

No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.

MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates

Historical results — all recorded matches on each map

MIRAGE model →

Map	CYBERSHOKE Prospects	vs	ex-Zero Tenacity	Edge
nuke	20% (1/5)		50% (21/42)	-30pp
overpass	0% (0/1)		30% (6/20)	-30pp
inferno	71% (5/7)		54% (19/35)	+17pp
mirage	50% (3/6)		35% (11/31)	+15pp
dust2	56% (9/16)		48% (21/44)	+8pp
anubis	40% (2/5)		43% (6/14)	-3pp
ancient	73% (8/11)	·	—
vertigo	—	·	—

Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database. Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.

MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities

BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best

MIRAGE model →

Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence

CYBERSHOKE Prospects bans

nuke 20% WR

anubis 40% WR

ex-Zero Tenacity bans

mirage 35% WR

dust2 48% WR

CYBERSHOKE Prospects pick

inferno

57% — CYBERSHOKE Prospects favored

Decider

ancient

Decider

vertigo

ex-Zero Tenacity pick

overpass

100% — ex-Zero Tenacity favored

Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played

nuke

29%

71%

ex-Zero Tenacity

overpass

100%

ex-Zero Tenacity

inferno

57%

43%

CYBERSHOKE Prospects

mirage

59%

41%

CYBERSHOKE Prospects

dust2

54%

46%

even

anubis

48%

52%

even

CYBERSHOKE Prospects on left · ex-Zero Tenacity on right · Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map · Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining

Side

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
MVP DAN9ARMATURA	46	38	8	63%	84.5	69.8%	1.23	—
SquEzxc	40	39	10	45%	79.3	64.2%	1.06	—
pleynnn	35	42	11	60%	72.5	62.3%	0.92	—
tw1sterzaza	31	42	16	52%	59.1	62.3%	0.82	—
dezl3bio	26	42	13	62%	61.6	58.5%	0.71	—
ex-Zero Tenacity WIN
MVP Cjoffo RIFLER	62	34	9	61%	112.4	75.5%	1.66	5.5
Kind0 RIFLER	49	35	11	53%	95.5	81.1%	1.43	5.2
brutmonster AWP	33	33	5	24%	58.8	67.9%	0.96	5.2
aVN RIFLER	32	38	10	41%	66.6	64.2%	0.90	4.1
emi SUPPORT	28	41	22	54%	64.2	71.7%	0.88	3.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
pleynnn	18	19	6	56%	84.9	71.4%	1.14	—
DAN9ARMATURA	18	18	3	61%	79.5	61.9%	1.07	—
SquEzxc	14	19	5	43%	68.9	57.1%	0.82	—
tw1sterzaza	11	20	3	27%	43.9	52.4%	0.54	—
dezl3bio	5	21	6	40%	34.1	47.6%	0.22	—
ex-Zero Tenacity WIN
Cjoffo	32	10	2	59%	135.1	100.0%	2.30	5.5
Kind0	21	15	3	48%	102.0	90.5%	1.55	5.2
aVN	20	15	5	40%	87.9	76.2%	1.37	4.1
brutmonster	12	11	3	8%	47.1	76.2%	1.00	5.2
emi	13	17	5	62%	66.0	76.2%	0.96	3.5

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
CYBERSHOKE Prospects WIN
DAN9ARMATURA	15	7	2	67%	100.9	85.7%	1.68	—
dezl3bio	15	8	2	67%	108.6	78.6%	1.62	—
SquEzxc	13	6	3	31%	91.6	85.7%	1.58	—
tw1sterzaza	11	7	8	73%	87.4	78.6%	1.38	—
pleynnn	11	9	5	64%	96.6	71.4%	1.26	—
ex-Zero Tenacity
Kind0	10	12	5	40%	76.2	64.3%	0.97	5.2
emi	7	13	8	71%	77.8	57.1%	0.72	3.5
Cjoffo	8	13	4	50%	59.8	57.1%	0.70	5.5
brutmonster	8	13	1	38%	62.6	42.9%	0.58	5.2
aVN	3	13	2	33%	39.9	35.7%	0.15	4.1

Player	K	D	A	HS%	ADR	KAST	Rating	CQR
CYBERSHOKE Prospects
DAN9ARMATURA	13	13	3	62%	77.6	66.7%	1.05	—
SquEzxc	13	14	2	62%	82.1	55.6%	0.95	—
tw1sterzaza	9	15	5	56%	54.9	61.1%	0.70	—
dezl3bio	6	13	5	67%	57.2	55.6%	0.58	—
pleynnn	6	14	0	67%	39.2	44.4%	0.39	—
ex-Zero Tenacity WIN
Cjoffo	22	11	3	68%	126.8	61.1%	1.66	5.5
Kind0	18	8	3	67%	102.8	83.3%	1.64	5.2
brutmonster	13	9	1	31%	69.6	77.8%	1.22	5.2
aVN	9	10	3	44%	62.4	72.2%	0.94	4.1
emi	8	11	9	25%	51.4	77.8%	0.90	3.5

Teams

Players in this match

Cjoffo Kind0 DAN9ARMATURA SquEzxc brutmonster pleynnn aVN emi tw1sterzaza dezl3bio