CQ
GESUS
No CQ-GESUS predictions available for this match.
MIRAGE · Per-Map Win Rates
Historical results — all recorded matches on each map
| Map | SAW | vs | Julie&Cie | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nuke
|
61% (89/145) |
|
0% (0/1) | +61pp |
anubis
|
52% (38/73) |
|
0% (0/3) | +52pp |
dust2
|
52% (24/46) |
|
25% (2/8) | +27pp |
mirage
|
22% (2/9) |
|
0% (0/1) | +22pp |
inferno
|
57% (50/87) |
|
67% (4/6) | -10pp |
ancient
|
51% (59/116) |
|
50% (3/6) | +1pp |
overpass
|
50% (21/42) | · | — | |
vertigo
|
58% (40/69) | · | — |
Win rates from all recorded CS2 results in the CQ database.
Edge = team1 win rate − team2 win rate on this map. Large edges (>10pp) signal map specialists.
MIRAGE · Veto Forecast + Map Win Probabilities
BO3 ban/pick simulation · each team bans worst maps, picks best
Predicted BO3 Veto Sequence
SAW bans
ancient
51% WR
dust2
52% WR
Julie&Cie bans
anubis
0% WR
inferno
67% WR
SAW pick
mirage
100% — SAW favored
Decider
nuke
100% SAW
Decider
vertigo
Julie&Cie pick
overpass
Per-Map Win Probability — If This Map Is Played
nuke
SAW
anubis
SAW
dust2
SAW
mirage
SAW
inferno
even
ancient
even
SAW on left ·
Julie&Cie on right ·
Win prob = each team's historical WR normalised head-to-head on that map ·
Veto simulates BO3: team bans 2 worst, picks best remaining
Side